Question:
Who Colinized South America?
: |
2009-09-25 11:11:49 UTC
I know it was mainly Spain, but who from Spain? Is there any certain people? Thanks :)
Thirteen answers:
SAMUEL ELI
2009-09-25 11:41:20 UTC
The countries of Spain, Portugal, Britain, Netherlands and France all colonized South America.



There were many involved in the colonization, and no one person was involved over the entire continent, especially since there were 5 different countries involved.



One person to check out for the Spanish colonization in the area of Peru is Pizarro.
anonymous
2009-09-25 11:45:38 UTC
The Spaish settled in most of South america, although Brazil was settled by the Portuguese, Guyana by the British, Suriname by the Dutch, and French Guina by the French.



All four of these countries have large African and Amerindian populations. Guyana also has a large number of people descended from East Asians (Indians). Suriname has a large number of Indonesians as well as ethnic Chinese and Indians. Large numbers of Hmong (from Laos) settled in French Guina in the 1970s.



The most important immigrant groups to settle in Brazil were: Africans, Portuguese, Italians, Spanish, Germans, Japanese, and Poles.



As for the former Spanish colonies, I'll leave a link for a Wikipeadia page about ethnic make-up. I haven't been able to find anything about how many Basques, Catalans, Galacians, Jews, etc. settled in South America. However, you should note that the language we commonly call "Spanish" is referred to as "Castillano" in Spain, so I think it is safe to assume that most of the settlers were originally from Castilla.
मिखेल
2009-09-25 11:25:40 UTC
I'm not an expert on Spanish colonial history, but I do know that all of the land controlled by the Spanish in North and Central America (including the Caribbean) was known as "The Viceroyality of New Spain". These colonies were run by a man called the Viceroy ("roy" being a corruption for the French "roi" meaning King, and you know what "vice" means. He was called "Virreye" in Spanish). You can find a comprehensive list of the Viceroys of New Spain here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viceroys_of_New_Spain



The other major divisions of the Spanish colonial empire were Peru and Rio de la Plata (the rest of Spanish South America). They were also run by viceroys whose names are listed here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Viceroys_of_Peru



and here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viceroyalty_of_the_Rio_de_la_Plata#List_of_viceroys
Eli
2009-09-25 20:00:31 UTC
Hernan Cortes conquered the Aztec Empire around 1520 then Fransisco Pizarro conquered the Incas. Obviously, the land was now theirs and Spain was the most powerful empire.
Vince M
2009-09-25 11:29:03 UTC
Not just Spain. Portugal particpated in a BIG way. That's why, in Brazil, they speak Portuguese. The British were involved, as well as the Dutch.
rabidkitty
2009-09-25 11:20:51 UTC
During the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, several catholic missions were created by the Jesuits in South America. Having arisen in the thirteenth century with the order of mendicants, work in evangelism and catechesis was greatly expanded in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, in the context of the maritime European expansion. Although they had an objective to diffuse the faith and convert natives, the missions ended up more as an instrument of colonialism. In exchange for political support from the Church, the State was responsible for sending and maintaining the missionaries and for protecting the Christians. In the analysis of Darcy Ribeiro in “As Américas e a Civilização”, the missions characterized themselves as a highly successful attempt of the Catholic Church (1) to Christianize native people, (2) to assure a refuge to native populations threatened by absorption or being enslaved by the diverse nuclei of descendants of Europeans, and (3) to organize native people in new forms that were capable of guaranteeing their survival and progress.

During the eighteenth century, the missionary movement faced problems in South America in areas of litigation between Spanish and Portuguese colonialism.



In the south of Brazil, the native population of the Sete Povos das Missões was submitted to the Madrid Treaty (1750), one of the main treaties signed by Portugal and Spain to define the colonized areas. (Blank, 2003) According to the Treaty of Madrid, it was established that transference of natives to the western margin of the Uruguay River, would mean for the Guaranis the destruction of the work of many generations and the deportation of more than thirty thousand people. The decision was made in agreement between Portugal, Spain, and even the Catholic Church, which sent emissaries to impose obedience over the natives. This placed the Jesuit missionaries in a delicate situation. If they supported the natives, then the church would consider them rebellious. But if they did not support the natives, the Indians would not trust the Jesuits anymore.



Some Jesuits remained in support of the crown, but others, such as the priest Lourenço Balda from the mission of São Miguel, supported the natives, and organized the resistance of those Indians to the occupation of their lands and slavery. The slaughter of the natives and Jesuits by soldiers of Portugal and Spain is named “Guerras Guaraníticas” (wars of Guarani). Despite the absurd military inferiority, the native resistance remained until 1767, thanks to the tactics and the leaderships of Sépé Tirayu and Nicolau Languiru. By the end of the eighteenth century, the Indians had been scattered, enslaved, or were refugees attempting to re-establish the tribal life that they treasured before the missions. (Blank, 2003)
Thamain P
2009-09-25 11:16:25 UTC
Spanish & Portugese. Queen Isabel of Spain was the one who odered the invasion, I believe.
anonymous
2009-09-25 11:15:10 UTC
Brazil was colonized by the portuguese.
Edward Bongshanks
2009-09-25 11:15:19 UTC
I'm not sure, but I'm sure white people had something to do with. When it comes to taking shyte over, you can always bet on them being around.
Brakes Required
2009-09-25 11:33:04 UTC
Thank you for not saying Colon ized. That would have been offal.
David
2009-09-25 11:15:40 UTC
the portuguese and the spanish.
anonymous
2009-09-25 11:15:10 UTC
Colin Powell? I guess if he went there, it would be sufficiently "colinized".
Dropkick-me Elmo
2009-09-25 11:14:58 UTC
i think that it was the king at the time. the actuall guy (not the king)'s name was Marquez (i think)


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...