Q1. There were two types of isotopes the scientists of the Manhatten Project could've used for an atomic bomb: uranium-235 and plutonium-239. Both these isotopes were suitable because they were fissile and so could be used for a nuclear fission bomb. Obtaining uranium-235 is difficult as it is only found in 0.7% of uranium, but obtaining plutonium-239 is much easier, as it is a product of the reaction between the uranium-238 isotope and neutrons in a fission reactor. Ultimately, both were used to compare their results and ionizing radiation. While tests of the plutonium-239 bomb were conducted before its use on Nagasaki, the uranium-235 bomb (being harder to assemble) was first used on Hiroshima without a test. Q2. Atomic weapons were still relatively unknown, especially their after effects such as radiation illness, cancer and leukemia. Truman did not care much for the victims of the atomic bombings, and was more interested in studying the effects the atomic bomb had on them. He established the Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission (ABCC) in 1948 for the sole purpose of investigating the effects of radiation on the victims. However, since it was not a provider of medical care, most victims generally mistrusted the ABCC. Q3. If the US reclined from using the A-bomb, there are mixed views on when Japan would surrender. Some historians say that the Soviet invasion of Manchuria in August 1945 was the key reason for Japan's surrender, stating that the capitulation of Japan's entire army in Manchuria (1.27 million men) was the final straw. If true, the use of the A-bomb would've played no part in Japan's surrender on August 15. The American public, who were under the impression that the Japanese would resist to the death, predicted a long campaign (perhaps a year or more) with huge casualties on both sides. Some of the US military generally believed Japan would eventually surrender, with the US Strategic Bombing Survey predicting it would arrive before 1 November 1945 and at the latest 31 December 1945, without the A-bomb, without a US invasion, and possibly even without Soviet intervention in Manchuria. Q4. During wartime, I would imagine they had close to zero respect. Some may still hold that resentment to this day. Q5. The US would do anything to protect their interests in Asia, prevent a Soviet Union expansion and communist influence in the region, and stay ahead of the Soviet Union. The intention of the atomic bomb wasn't to threaten the Soviet Union, but to warn them to stay away from Japan. It was successful, as the Soviets didn't ask for an occupation zone of Japan. Both sides were aware of the impending Cold War and therefore tried to seize as much enemy territory as possible, while converting their occupied regions to their ideology, and attempting to recruit as many ex-Nazi scientists for their space program. I think the answers to questions 1-5 answer why Truman dropped the atom bomb: 1. There was a new destructive weapon that could be used to end the war immediately. 2. There was a golden opportunity to examine the effects of this new weapon before the war ends. 3. If it wasn't used, the war might've dragged on further with more US casualties. 4. The American public would want to see it used, and end the war ASAP. 5. It would intimidate the Soviets and keep them off Japan.