Question:
Why did Revolution occur in France and not in other European countries?
blueharbor22
2005-12-09 21:18:55 UTC
The feudal system was weaker in France than in many European countries, yet why was there a Revolution in France in 1789 and not anywhere else?
Four answers:
anonymous
2005-12-09 21:47:53 UTC
i could type it out, but this answer is well writen.



"Origins of the Revolution

Historians disagree in evaluating the factors that brought about the Revolution. To some extent at least, it came not because France was backward, but because the country’s economic and intellectual development was not matched by social and political change. In the fixed order of the ancien régime, most bourgeois were unable to exercise commensurate political and social influence. King Louis XIV, by consolidating absolute monarchy, had destroyed the roots of feudalism; yet outward feudal forms persisted and became increasingly burdensome. 2

France was still governed by privileged groups—the nobility and the clergy—while the productive classes were taxed heavily to pay for foreign wars, court extravagance, and a rising national debt. For the most part, peasants were small landholders or tenant farmers, subject to feudal dues, to the royal agents indirect farming (collecting) taxes, to the corvée (forced labor), and to tithes and other impositions. Backward agricultural methods and internal tariff barriers caused recurrent food shortages, which netted fortunes to grain speculators, and rural overpopulation created land hunger. 3

In addition to the economic and social difficulties, the ancien régime was undermined intellectually by the apostles of the Enlightenment. Voltaire attacked the church and absolutism; Denis Diderot and the Encyclopédie advocated social utility and attacked tradition; the baron de Montesquieu made English constitutionalism fashionable; and the marquis de Condorcet preached his faith in progress. Most direct in his influence on Revolutionary thought was J. J. Rousseau, especially through his dogma of popular sovereignty. Economic reform, advocated by the physiocrats and attempted (1774–76) by A. R. J. Turgot, was thwarted by the unwillingness of privileged groups to sacrifice any privileges and by the king’s failure to support strong measures. 4

The direct cause of the Revolution was the chaotic state of government finance. Director general of finances Jacques Necker vainly sought to restore public confidence. French participation in the American Revolution had increased the huge debt, and Necker’s successor, Charles Alexandre de Calonne, called an Assembly of Notables (1787), hoping to avert bankruptcy by inducing the privileged classes to share in the financial burden. They refused in an effort to protect economic privileges."



www.bartleby.com is your friend.
attitudecomesfar
2005-12-10 01:45:39 UTC
I think in France there was a strong feeling against kings and aristocracy and there was a big poverty where all the new and elightening ideas of "illustration" took place.

The ideas of new world considering the initial USA were too a spark to create a new france: the way asking the king for a change, but after the refusing of the king the taking of the bastille jail (the symbol of opression) and the the revolution.

I hope u like it forst of all sorry for my bad english
Grouchy Dude
2005-12-18 16:11:55 UTC
The English had a revolution in 1688 (The Glorious Revolution). It's true that they replaced one monarchy with another (James II out; William and Mary in), but the monarchy never again had as much power as it had before 1688.
?
2016-09-23 21:26:59 UTC
Britain of direction. this is the place the business Revolution substitute into began. effect substitute into that Britain substitute into became right into a great means which enable it to regulate, on the top of its means, a million/3 of the worldwide under the British Empire.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...