Question:
Bible Fables... Help me disprove them...?
1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC
Bible Fables... Help me disprove them...?
36 answers:
Allie N
2006-10-05 11:23:51 UTC
everyone who has tried to disprove the bible always finds God he is real i hope you find him
2006-10-05 11:14:25 UTC
If you are so sure you are correct, why do you need someone else to help you disprove the stories of the Bible?
jbtascam
2006-10-05 11:19:51 UTC
Wow, I can't believe this hasn't been attempted before! You mean NOBODY has ever questioned the veracity or accuracy of the Bible? Gee...what a visionary you are! Well, here's my first 3 thoughts on the subject....



1) You can't disprove Daniel and the Lions. The only references in hisory to it are in the Bible. Whether it happened or not cannot now be "investigated" as you won't even be able to find the scene of the crime.



2) There was very little "miraculous" about David's defeat of Goliath, so I'm not sure why you want to go there. Millitary strategists have known for years that a person with a ranged weapon has the edge on a person without one for years.



3) Jonah was swallowed by a great fish - not a whale. Please get your facts straight before you try to debunk a "fable." This one should be relatively easy to debunk - I suggest you do a personal experiment and get yourself swallowed by a great "fish." If we don't see you vomitted up on the beach in 3 days, you will be vindicated!
blue2monday
2006-10-05 11:19:46 UTC
Write your own damn thesis, fool! Maybe you should change the subject to: "Dumbass Ideas From College Students That Got Their Tuition Paid By Their Parents"!
Master_of_my_own_domain
2006-10-05 11:14:52 UTC
It's obviously a fable.



There's no one on the Lion's named Daniel. Nor on the Bears, the Ravens or the Packers.



Go Cowboys!
West Coast Nomad
2006-10-05 11:48:46 UTC
During the period of the merchant marine and great shipping lines there was an instance of a sailor who had fallen overboard in a storm and apparently was swallowed by a small sperm whale. By chance the whale was captured and the sailor was found alive in the whales stomach. He was revived and put in a straight jacket and regained his sanity by the time the boat reached land. Apparently there was enough oxygen for him to breathe. You talk about writing a thesis so I assume that you are in college. Why would you do something so lazy and stupid as to use Yahoo for your "research". If you are going to plagarize someone else's thoughts then just look through the thesis archives of your college. You are not the first person to write a thesis one disproving the Bible and most of the people before you had a lot more intelligence.
2006-10-05 11:47:16 UTC
In history, including the History of Art, there are many parallels to Jesus, both before and after he actually lived. The evidence that he actually lived is so overwhelming, that you are digging a ditch to china to prove that the earth is round. Hey, it is round, and the book of Job said so, before anybody else knew it.
mei-lin
2006-10-05 11:20:21 UTC
sorry, you are on your own.
mermer7@sbcglobal.net
2006-10-05 11:15:00 UTC
You can not disprove the Bible. It's impossible.
roxy
2006-10-05 11:14:26 UTC
Can someone disprove your existance please? You are brutal!
Goose&Tonic
2006-10-05 13:06:08 UTC
Pretty difficult to definitively prove or disprove ANYTHING that is 2000 years old. But basic common sense will tell anyone that you can't live in the belly of a whale, you can't turn water into wine, and that giants don't exist. (Neither do 600 year old men and pairs of unicorns, for that matter).



PS: If you won't be convinced that the bible is real, how do you expect others to be convinced that it isn't?
SteveUK
2006-10-05 11:39:12 UTC
There are far too many irregularities in the Bible, both OT & NT.

Several historic facts can help point you in the right direction;

1/ Judaism was created during the collapse of the Egyptian Empire circa 650BC, when the pharoah issued an edict offering a fully stocked ship to any who wished to leave the country. The architects plundered the tombs of the gold, which the Jewish faith described as 'borrowing', hence the pharoah sending troops after them. Many different groups left Egypt at this time, and the area was later conquered by Alex the Great. As the great Flood happened circa 4000BC, no Jews could have been there. Mostly Sumerians who believed in a religion based on Nephilim. Ergo Noah could not be Jewish.

2/ Jesus (who was a real person, a follower of John the Baptist, but not the son of God, just a reformer) was a Kabbalist Jew, who believed that the Jewish leaders, under Rome, had become greedy and corrupt, and had twisted the teachings of Moses, Elijah etc. Jesus never threatened the Romans, just the Jewish leaders, such as Caephus (High Priest of Judea) & Herod. Jesus hence believed that all humans contain a small part of the divine within them, something the pharoah Arkhenhaten had stolen from the Sumerians (who believed Homo Sapiens were half Nephilim half Homo Erectus), when creating the first monotheist religion, Ra worship. One symbol of Ra is the Golden Calf, which is exactly what the Jews built whilst Moses was off gathering commandments. Coincidence, I think not.

3/ Darwinism proves evolution, therefore Genesis is wrong about the garden of Eden. Apart from which who were the people living in the Land Of Nod if God had only created Adam & Eve. Simple maths.



Hope there is enough reference material there to get you started.

You might also wish to search, Gnostic Gospels, Simon Magus, The Hittite Capitals Libraries (1000s of tablets written circa 1100 with no reference to any biblical people, though referring to Persians, Greeks, Assyrians, Egyptians et al. ergo further proof the Jews did not exist till after then)



PS I am not Anti-Semitic, it is just that Judaism is the root of the OT, NT, Koran etc, so disprove Judaism and you disprove that which claims to be its descendants.
Marti1owl
2006-10-05 12:18:53 UTC
I recently read three really good books on the Bible: "101 Myths of the Bible", "Misquoting Jesus" and "Holy Blood, Holy Grail". I don't see that these books can disprove anything but they are historically informative. There has been a lot of research into the writings in the Bible as to how, when, why and by whom it was put together, what was put in and what was left out.



I am thoroughly convinced that the Bible is not the "inspired Word of God". It was written by man and manipulated by man to man's own ends.



There is a lot of truth in it and the allegories and

parables are teaching tools. When you take them literally you miss the deeper meaning and thus, the truth.



Just because many people believe something is true doesn't make it true. It only feels true to those who believe it.
amass
2016-11-27 00:12:03 UTC
Yeah, Sinthyia genuinely has a following right here on Yahoo! solutions. better on your huge understanding Sinthia... in spite of everything, that looks what Yahoo! solutions human beings are about... There are, in spite of the indisputable fact that, a lot of "skeptic's" internet web content dedicated to this question. i'd say they don't look to be extremely skeptic as a lot as only don't have self belief some thing with that many contradictions. of direction, you probable can argue that this does no longer disprove God or Jesus, yet you DO could confess that the Bible has contradictions in case you do not opt for to look nuts. ok, so the authorship became shoddy and not in any respect each man or woman's attitude on their thoughts (the Bible became first scribed lengthy after the debts - Jewish and Christian faith both being initially from oral traditions). in this, i'd say that the Druids were proper. some thing would were lost when we began rote memorization of script truly of putting each little thing to song (note that Jews nonetheless sing their scripture). or you may want to argue some thing became received in that the variety of tremendous number of inconsistencies at the instantaneous are clear. possibly the suited income lets make is that our divisiveness and hatered over non secular ameliorations is stupid. there is not any acceptable faith obtainable, so why make the variety of fuss over it?
charity
2006-10-05 13:06:45 UTC
This question is like trying to prove that Alexander the Great didn't exist. Although the book doesn't talk about Moses, my book does say that Hatshepsut, the first great woman ruler of Egypt, daughter of Pharaoh, is probably the woman who found Moses in the bulrushes. This is because of ancient writings found where Hatshepsut finds a boy child in bulrushes. Archaeologists have recently found Nebuchadnezzar's hanging gardens, the Bible spoke of. Before they found this, like you, historians thought it was fake.



Historians have also said Belshazzar was fake. They said that they had evidence that only his father, Nabonidus, had lived. In the mid- nineteenth century they found clay tablets near Babylon as evidence of Belshazzar. In Daniel when he was reading the writing on the wall, Belshazzar said that Daniel would be the third ruler in the land. Why would Belshazzar offer Daniel the third highest position in land? It was because Belshazzar was ruling while his father was on a "vacation" in Arabia. Third position was the next highest position. When Daniel got thrown into the lion's den King Darius the Mede was ruling. Daniel also foretold of Alexander the Great's kingdom being divided into four seperate kingdoms. It came true.



The Epic of Gilgamesh, a piece of Babylonian literature, says that there was a universal flood. The Mayans, Incas, Egyptians, and Sumerians all wrote of a universal flood. Anti- Semitism means haters of the decendents of Shem. the Israelites and Arabians are decendents from Shem. The Egyptians are descendents from Mizraim who is the son of Ham. The Romans and Greeks are descendents from Japheth. Shem, Ham, and Japheth are all sons of Noah.



In Esther it talks about Xerxes I or King Ahasuerus banished his Queen Vashti for not parading herself for his army. Xerxes I built the Hellespont Bridge with 674 ships.



In the section of the Red Sea, where Moses crossed with the Israelites, archaelogists have found chariots in the middle of the water. Now, how did they get there?



Many Biblical facts coinside with historical facts. You should look them up. Do a little homework it might help you.
Venus M
2006-10-05 11:20:25 UTC
You won't be able to disprove Goliath. Using science and medicine, I recently found out that there is a tumor (a natural one) that is in our heads that controls how tall we grow and some hormones. Sometimes that tumor malfunctions and causes people to have giantism. It is very possible that Goliath was close to nine feet tall, although probably still young. Late teens/early twenties, because people with giantism dvelop problems in their joints as they get older. Also the tumor begins to press on their optic nerves, which may explain why Goliath didn't see David swinging that rock at him. He was half blind. I'm sure in battle he was something to be reckoned with, but against a kid and a small rock, Goliath didn't have a chance. Hows that for science. Sorry I didn't disprove it, but you have a heck of a task because people have been trying to disprove the Bible for centuries. If they couldn't do it, I seriously doubt that you will. Especially since you are asking help in writing a thesis on yahoo?! That doesn't strike me as the most intelligent person, but rather just a controversial one.
Bound For Success
2006-10-05 11:51:37 UTC
You will not be able to disprove The Truth . Its like you going 60 yrs down the road and telling someone about what you did in the past it actually happened. And then having other people there to back up your story.You cant change the past or history its already happened and will continue to happen. If the Bible was called a history book would you believe it then? Thats What it is and you cant change it Stop waisting your time.
bradthepilot
2006-10-05 11:38:49 UTC
people have been trying to make the numbers and science disprove the Bible for a very long time without success. In fact, there are physics doctors that have proven much of the Bible. Regardless, I would bet that a number of the people that hang out on religious boards could help you.
Godfrey M
2006-10-05 12:10:32 UTC
Dear JW,

I think you are in for big TROUBLE. YOU just cant disapprove the Bible because it starts beyond your imagination and ends where you do not even know.

The sad thing is, you dont even want to know.

HOW CAN YOU REALLY FIGHT SOMETHING YOU DONT KNOW OR UNDERSTAND?

If you continue that way, you are fighting a losing battle.

To HELP YOU:

1. Get to know the BIBLE and cleary UNDERSTAND its foundations before you launch a battle to disapprove it.

2. Research has been done and we have never seen an ape in transition to a human or any closer. What of a turtle to a bird? You may be judged stupid when you think of yourself too wise to challenge the foundation of the house you sit in. I am talking of the "God of Israel"
peteophile
2006-10-05 11:38:08 UTC
Surely just dating the various flood stories would show that the jewish OT written 6th c BCE was well after the greek deculion story which hesiod (i think)told in theogony around 700bce and the babylonian and hittite versions are probably 300-500 yrs older.
thalog482
2006-10-05 11:24:50 UTC
Well actually even some denominations of Christianity discredit those stories, though, not for the extraordinary nature of them so much as, throwing out the entire old testament in the belief that it was corrupted by the traditions of jewish culture at the time, and certainly, it's undeniable that Leviticus is greatly influenced by the archaic jewish culture, perhaps entirely concieved by it. There's Marcionism for one, though the Catholic church refers to them as heretics, of course, no one besides the catholics has ever paid any attention to anything the catholic church says. Thomas Jefferson made his own compilation of the bible, it's called The Jefferson Bible, he basically threw everything out, even the works of the four evangelists, and extracted solely the teachings of Jesus and the story of his life. Which, while I wouldn't quite agree with throwing out the four evangelists, it does prove to show the importance of Jesus' teachings above religious semantics, Jesus's teachings being based solely on love. For example a number of christians today have a tendency to hate homosexuals over one flimsily written verse, one that was never actually stated by Jesus himself, and to hate anyone is contradictory to the teachings of Jesus.



Though, since you're not the claimant of the stories, you don't have their burden of proof, but if you're going to be making a thesis about it, it might interest you to know that there have even been Christian denominations that have denied the entire old testament.
Eldude
2006-10-05 11:18:05 UTC
Why waist your time, it has been done. Besides your attempting to parasite and plagiarize other peoples research. The information you receive here can't even be documented, for the most part.



Face it, you just hate Christians which shows you are intolerant. Why do you fear something that you don't believe, unless your paranoid.



Don't people have the right to believe what they wish or do you believe that the First Amendment should be repealed and the government forbid religion.
s. k
2006-10-05 11:48:04 UTC
You can't disprove a fable. It would be like trying to disprove a novel. What you probably want to do is state that the bible is nothing but a book of fables.
2006-10-05 11:17:55 UTC
this is not an idiot statement.



what do u mean there is no hell?

we're here ain't we?

hell is here, right now,

with the heavens above.



unless u wish 2 disprove the Heavens?

u could try.

good luck.



me,

i wouldn't bother trying 2 disprove it.

better things 2 do.
danksprite420
2006-10-05 11:27:56 UTC
But why try and disprove some ones religion, are you that cold that you have to rip hope from people. for some people that's all they have.
anieska
2006-10-05 11:23:59 UTC
Go ahead and follow the path other scholars took... they also had such beginnings but ended up real winners! Ex. C. S. Lewis
tommygirl
2006-10-05 11:14:46 UTC
The only thing that will convince people that there is not hell is for them to wait about 20 seconds after they die and find themselves there. Then you'll have all the time in the world to ponder such things. Good luck!
gigi_the_girl_anachronism
2006-10-05 11:15:29 UTC
why in the world would you want to waste your time on that. nobody's going to listen. and to me it's pretty much impossible to disprove. They were miracles which means that there's no way on God's green Earth that you can explain or disprove them.
Jabberwock
2006-10-05 11:19:03 UTC
I agree with you that most of it is a crock. To actually PROVE that these things didn't happen is no more possible than proving that they did happen. The biggest proof I have is, if god was so vocal a long time age than where did he go now? I think we've just wised up a bit. Lightening doesn't make us think of the gods any more.
2006-10-05 11:14:25 UTC
What is hateful to you, do not do to your neighbor. This is the whole Torah; all the rest is commentary.

— Hillel, Talmud, Shabbath 31a
2006-10-05 11:15:10 UTC
i seen this show once it was called the making of the gods and it proved that there were no gods
joeiacovino
2006-10-05 11:13:57 UTC
Go to www.TheGodMovie.com



Tons of info... you should probably rder the movie.
2006-10-05 11:14:11 UTC
I don't have any help for you but I hope you find what you need.
Lost Phoenix
2006-10-05 11:16:20 UTC
you're failling on your thesis,what a waste of time!
greg577452004
2006-10-05 11:13:04 UTC
? what
Baby
2006-10-05 11:26:17 UTC
The resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead has always been a contentious area of discussion with the world. It is this event which has drawn the most criticism from the skeptics; and for very good reason. For the authority of Jesus's teachings was based on His claim that He was the unique Son of God. Yet, Jesus was dependant on the resurrection from the dead to prove that He was the Son of God (Matthew 16:21, Mark 8:31, Luke 9:22, and John 2:19-21). It is, therefore, imperative that we go to the event of the resurrection to ascertain whether or not Jesus is who He says He is, and furthermore to ascertain whether the scriptures can be believed as the true Word of God. A key Scripture which points this out is 1 Corinthians 15:14-19:



"If Christ has not been raised, our preaching is useless and so is your faith...you are still in your sins...[you] are to be pitied more than all men."

Thus, in order to have true faith in the scriptures, which maintain not only that Jesus is the Son of God, but that He is our saviour, we must believe in his BODILY RESURRECTION, because Christ's bodily resurrection proves what Jesus claims for Himself, and proves the scriptures to be accurate, and therefore, authoritative!



We then come to the question of how we can know the authenticity of the resurrection? Is it only by faith? For if the resurrection proves who Jesus is, and by so doing also gives credibility to the scriptures, it is imperative that it can be shown to be historically trustworthy. And it is. Let me share with you eight reasons why:



1: The Prophets Spoke of it in the Old Testament

There are numerous places where the prophets spoke of the Messiah who would come first to suffer and then to triumph over that suffering, pointing to the death and resurrection. There are three passages in particular which speak of the Messiah's death, followed by his victory:



Psalm 22: we read about agony and desolation in verses 1-21, followed by deliverance and faithfulness in verses 22-31.



Psalm 69: we read of a suffering man and death in verses 1-29, but then find praise and triumph in verses 30-36.



Isaiah 53: probably the most well-known chapter in the Old Testament which refers to the death and resurrection.Here in verses 1-9 we find some of the most vivid descriptions of a suffering and sacrificial servant. Yet, this is followed in verses 10-11 by the promise that the servant would see His offspring, that His days would be prolonged, and that He will see the fruit of His labours, all inferring a resolution to the misery and death which He would suffer.

All three point to the coming death and resurrection.



2: Jesus Foretold it in the New Testament

A number of times Jesus spoke of His impending death and resurrection prior to His death. He mentioned it:



To the Pharisees at the Temple, in John 2:19-21



On His way to Jerusalem He talked about it in Matthew 16:21, and Luke 9:22.



After Peter's confession He referred to it in Mark 8:31.



At the Mount of Olives He prayed about it, in Mark 14:28.

3: The Historical Record Implies It

We also have Jewish and Roman Historians who refer to the crucifixion of Jesus:



Thallus, a Greek writer from around 50 AD talks of the Crucifixion, and even mentions the darkness and earthquakes which followed it.



Josephus, a Jewish historian who lived in Rome around 93 A.D., mentioned not only Jesus's death but the work of John the Baptist and Jesus's brother, James.



Tacitus, a Roman historian in 115 A.D., speaks of the Crucifixion of Jesus, as does the author of a fifth century document named the Toledoth Jeshu.

As for the resurrection, we know it was referred to by first and second century Jews because of the writings of the early church father, Justin Martyr. He details how the Jews in the diaspora were fomenting the story that the empty tomb was caused by the disciples of Jesus who stole the body. They wouldn't need the story if the tomb hadn't been empty.



4: The Empty Tomb Provides Us With Evidence

This then leads us to the greatest evidence which we can point to: the empty tomb itself. What is as clear today as it has been for almost two thousand years, is that NO BODY HAS EVER BEEN PRODUCED! Only some empty clothes. There has never been any dispute by the Jews, or the Romans or the Christians over the fact that the tomb was empty. Everyone is agreed on this point. The alternative would have been too difficult to prove. What is so amazing about this simple fact are the implications behind the empty tomb. In order to understand these implications, it might be good to remind ourselves of the scenario surrounding the tomb. Consider the following:



According to archaeological evidence a two-ton STONE would have been used as a doorway for the tomb. This would have been wedged into a slanted groove above and to the left of the entrance to the tomb. Once the body had been placed inside the tomb, the wedge would have been removed and the stone would have been rolled over the doorway to block any potential grave robbers. Yet this enormous stone was found laying up and away from the entrance of the tomb (see Mark 16, and John 20). It has been suggested that it would have taken almost twenty men to have accomplished such a feat.



A Roman SEAL (made up of a rope slung across the surface of the stone, and attached to the sides of the tomb wall) would have been fastened, to warn away robbers (Matthew 27:66). The punishment for defacing a Roman Seal was death, carried out by being crucified upside-down. This seal was missing when the empty tomb was discovered.



Sixteen GUARDS would have been stationed at the sepulchre (Matthew 27:66). Four immediately in front of the tomb, and the remaining twelve in groups of four fanning out in a semi-circle. These were not Jewish temple guards, but Roman legionnaires; the most disciplined fighting force of their era; the "creme-de-la-creme!" They would have all known that the penalty for sleeping on the job was execution, by being burned to death with their own clothes. The scriptures tell us that these guards, upon realizing that the tomb was empty, did not go back to their barracks, but went to the Jewish priests. Why? Because they knew they would not be believed by their own superiors, and would have been executed for sleeping on the job. They went to the temple priests to have them plead their case for them. And we know that the temple priests bribed the soldiers to tell the people that the disciples stole the body (refer to Matthew 28:11-15).



Recently in the town of Nazareth, a MARBLE SLAB was discovered, written in the name of Caesar (thus dating it to around the time of Jesus). On it was inscribed the penalty of death for anyone robbing or defacing a tomb. Yet, we know that prior to this time the crime for grave robbery only warranted a fine. It seems a stiffer penalty was suddenly imposed in the 1st century, due possibly to the embarrassment of Christ's empty tomb.

* So we have an empty tomb, in which lay some empty grave garments. We have a two-ton stone moved up and away from the entrance, and the seal broken. On top of that we have sixteen of the best soldiers in the world befuddled as to how the stone, the seal, and the body could have been moved while they were standing on guard just a few feet away. On these points not too many people dispute.



There are however a few theories which are being bandied about by those trying to come up with excuses for the empty tomb. Some of them are quite comical. Let me just list them below:





The tomb was unknown to the disciples. Yet, Joseph of Arimathea must have known; as it was his tomb. The authorities and others must have known.



The women found the wrong tomb. If that were so, then did the whole world also find the wrong tomb? Because till this day no alternative has ever been produced.



The disciples and the women were only hallucinating. Why then did the Roman guards have to make such a fast retreat to the Jewish priests? Were they hallucinating too, at risk to their lives?



The body was stolen by the disciples. What then about the guards, and their witness? Can anyone imagine the timid disciples overpowering the Roman guards, moving the two-ton stone, and reviving a dead Jesus?



The Swoon theory is the favourite among some skeptics. Jesus, once in the cool cave, came to, with no wounds, and no garments. He then moved the two-ton stone, overpowered the guards and went about preaching a new religion!



The newest theory is called the Passover plot. Jesus, who knew he would be killed had himself drugged, and like the swoon theory, though wounded, came to, moved the stone, overpowered the guard, and changed the world?

5: The Many Post-Resurrection Appearances (15)

Along with this evidence are the many post-resurrection appearances. In all there were fifteen, over a period of forty days, and at different times of the day:



Mary Magdalene in the morning,



the Emmaus travellers in the afternoon, and



amongst the 11 apostles in the evening.

According to Paul, Jesus even appeared to 500 witnesses at one time (1 Corinthians 15). If each of them were to give six minutes of testimony, we would have 50 hours of testimony. Some of the witnesses were even hostile witnesses, such as Thomas, James and Saul (who later became Paul).



6: It Changed Their Lives

A further evidence is the change which came over the disciples. One may ask why should these disciples speak up about the resurrection? They were not sophisticated. They had no prestige, no wealth, and no social status. These disciples, who had fled when the soldiers came to arrest Jesus, had denied him and hid in the upper room over the next few day, were now being beaten, stoned, thrown to the lions, tortured, and crucified for what they now knew. They were giving their lives to preach Christ's resurrection. They certainly would not have changed so dramatically for a lie. Certainly this movement had something unique about it that other movements did not have.

We know of about a dozen other movements that arose in Palestine within a hundred years before and after the time of Jesus. One of the best known was an uprising led by a man called Judas the Galilean at about the time of the birth of Jesus. He along with hundreds of his followers were picked up by the authorities and crucified (Josephus, Antiquities, 17:271-298). About a hundred years after the death of Jesus another charasmatic individual, Simeon ben-Kosiba, led a revolution which attracted hundreds of followers, all believing he was the promised Messiah. They too were hunted down by the authorities and killed. In all these movements, the death of the leader signalled the death of the movement.



The rule was, that if your messiah' was killed then obviously he was not the true messiah, and the best solution was to give up the cause or choose another from his family. Like the movements of that time, they could have chosen James the brother of Jesus as their new Messiah, since he was a leader at the centre of the early Jerusalem church for thirty years, until his death; but the early Christians refused to give him that status. That was the rule, yet the followers of Jesus continued to follow Jesus long after his death for one simple reason; their Messiah had not been defeated by death but had risen from the dead (Matthew 28; Mark 16; Luke 24; and John 20-21). It was this fact alone which seperated Jesus from all those who came before or since, and for whom the disciples were willing to die. In fact all of the apostles except one died for this man who no longer lived, yet whose message had so changed their lives.



Yet it wasn't only the apostles who were changed, for we find that even hostile Jewish witnesses believed. Take the many Jewish priests who became Christians, according to Acts 6:7, as well as the thousands of early converts who were all Jerusalem Jews. They were right there where the tomb was situated. They could easily have looked for the tomb themselves, and could have talked to the witnesses who had claimed to have seen Jesus, as I'm sure many did. Yet, they too chose to be persecuted for what they knew was true.



7: It Was the Foundation for a New Faith

This resurrection became the foundation for our faith today. That is why we worship on Sundays and not on Fridays (like the Muslims), nor on Saturdays (like the Jews). That is why we participate in the ritual of baptism (symbolizing the dying/living of Christ). And that is why we celebrate communion, to commemorate not only the death on the cross but the joy of resurrection from the grave.

8: Today, Learned Men Believe It

And finally, the resurrection can be believed because learned men, who have studied and researched it believe in it. Take for example:



Brooke Foss Wescott (a textual critic) who says: "There is no historic incident better or more variously supported than the resurrection of Christ."



Dr. Paul L. Maier (professor of ancient history) maintains: "No shred of evidence has yet been discovered in literary sources, epigraphy or archaeology that would disprove that the tomb in which Jesus was buried was actually empty on the morning of the 1st Easter."



Dr. Simon Greenleaf (a Harvard University professor of Law) states: "According to the laws of legal evidence used in courts of law, there is more evidence for the historical fact of the resurrection of Jesus Christ than for just about any other event in history."



Dr. Frank Morrison (a rationalistic lawyer) decided to take three years off from his practice to disprove the resurrection. After three years of study, he found that the sheer weight of the evidence compelled him to conclude that Jesus actually did rise from the dead. As a consequence he wrote the book: Who Moved the Stone?



C.S.Lewis (a literary genius) was also interested in the accuracy of the resurrection. After evaluating the basis and evidence for Christianity, Lewis concluded that in other religions there was 'no such historical claim as in Christianity.' He was too experienced in literary criticism to regard the Gospel as myth. He had no other choice but to accept the resurrection as fact.

Conclusion

So what, then can we say concerning the resurrection? Can it be believed? If we add the testimony of the Old Testament prophets with those of Jesus, as well as all the historical data which we possess on the death and resurrection of Christ, and if we contemplate all the ramifications of the empty tomb, the many post-resurrection appearances, the changed lives of the disciples and the opinions of learned men today, we come away with a hugely well supported case for the validity of the resurrection.

Consequently, the evidence for the resurrection overwhelmingly supports the contention that Jesus did indeed rise from the dead. This fact alone gives us substantial confirmation that the validity for our scriptures is likewise sound, which in turn encourages us in our preaching, knowing that what we say has and can be supported with evidence. It is this which undergirds not only our faith, but moves us on and out to share "Christ crucified and resurrected" with those who have yet to hear.



The Resurrection



The Certainty and The Proof

By Jim Searcy



We should study the proofs of the Resurrection. The more we study

the Resurrection the more strength we will find to endure, even

finding great joy in great tribulation. And if Messiah (Christ) be

not raised, your faith is vain; ye are yet in your sins. 1 Cor 15:17



Without the fact of the Resurrection our faith is in vain. But we

KNOW that Christ was delivered for our offences, and was raised

again for our justification. The Resurrection of Jesus Christ is

perhaps the most firm and solidly established fact of all history.



Many atheists, agnostics, and unbelievers, who had some intellectual

honesty, that set out to prove the resurrection of Jesus Christ was

false, myth, or a fabrication, have ended up finding strong faith in

the Lord Jesus Christ. Otherwise they become demonically reprobate

because the Resurrection is just that SOLID IN TRUTH. People who

study the resurrection find faith. The more one studies the

resurrection the stronger that faith becomes. The Resurrection is

the final defeat of all heretics, unbelievers, atheists, and

agnostics. No one can disprove the resurrection. Anyone seriously

studying the resurrection will either find faith or they become

totally reprobate and would not know or regard the truth if it hit

them head on. The more one studies the resurrection the more solid,

unmovable, and unshakable one's faith becomes. That is the central

fact and truth that gave such strength and confidence to all of the

martyrs of THE Faith. Few things TODAY could be more important, and

have greater rewards of study, to people of THE faith today.

Studying the resurrection is great preparation to stand and endure

to the end of this antichrist war on the saints.



Lord willing we will get this study of the Resurrection up on the

GJiGT web sites. We do hope you will DILIGENTLY go through this

study of the Resurrection with us. You will be blessed and

strengthened to be able to encourage and strengthen your brethren.

You will be better equipped to give an answer to those who ask the

reason of the HOPE that is in you.



So, how would you prove the fact of the resurrection to the

skeptic? Four things should come to mind: 1)the empty tomb; 2)the

radically changed lives of the disciples who ALL were suddenly so

bold that they joyfully faced death for their belief; 3)the witness

of more than 500 people who saw Yeshua alive after He was crucified;

and 4)His Tallit or prayer shawl.



The TALLIT, or prayer shawl, called the napkin or fringes, in the

KJV Holy Bible, is so sacred and personal, that Jewish men, even

today, are often buried in it. All Jewish men just then, as Jesus

and Lazarus, were buried with the tallit about their head. There are

many scriptural proofs that Jesus always had his Tallit. In John

11:44 we see where Yeshua raised Lazarus from death, and that

Lazarus had been buried in his Tallit. John 11:44 says - And he that

was dead came forth, bound hand and foot with graveclothes: and his

face was bound about with a napkin. Jesus saith unto them, Loose

him, and let him go. Yeshua told those nearby to loose the cloth

from around his head. That NAPKIN is his TALLIT. Each man has a

personal and SPECIAL way of folding his tallit. Many Jews today, who

when leaving their house for a short time without their tallit, will

make sure the fringes are pointing at the doorway. For over three

years Peter and John had seen how Yeshua would fold His tallit.



Yeshua, the Messiah, also was put in the tomb with His prayer shawl

about His head. The TALLIT, which the KJV Holy Bible calls the

napkin, is one of the many great infallible proofs, as Jesus showed

Himself ALIVE after his death on the cross. In John 20:6-8 we

read, "Then cometh Simon Peter following him, and went into the

sepulchre, and seeth the linen clothes lie, And the napkin, that was

about his head, not lying with the linen clothes, but wrapped

together in a place by itself. Then went in also that other

disciple, which came first to the sepulchre, and he saw, and

believed." As Peter and then John entered the empty tomb, they saw

something that immediately convinced them that the resurrection of

Yeshua was irrefutable fact. This is just a single small example of

the richness of the proof of the resurrection. It also shows why

Gentiles should rejoice that the Jewish Roots of the Gospel are

being restored by the modern Messianic movement.



Yeshua knew that when Simon Peter burst into the tomb and found it

empty, Peter would think the Romans had somehow disposed of the

body. That is why Yeshua, at the time of His resurrection, on

Saturday, the Sabbath, Nissan 17, three days and nights after His

death on the cross on Wednesday, Nissan 14, 30AD, folded His Tallit.

Yeshua took the time to precisely fold His prayer shawl, His TALLIT,

and lay it apart from the other grave wrappings. When Peter saw the

tallit, as only Yeshua would fold it, he knew that the Romans did

not take the body; because, if they had, NO WAY would they have

folded, or even known how Yeshua folded His tallit. One MUST be

alive to fold that tallit, Yeshua's way, as Peter and John knew very

well.



Every Christian MAN should have a Tallit, God said so. Num 15:38 and

Deut 22:12 are two good places to see that God said so. Regardless

how good your prayer life is without a tallit, it will be better

with a tallit. One thing every Tallit owner knows, is that every man

always folds his Tallit the same way every time. The only one in

that sealed tomb was Yeshua. The Yeshua folded tallit, conclusively

and positively announced to His disciples, He IS ALIVE!



The resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead is the doctrine that

gives Christians the strength to endure great tribulation. The

Christian faith has proven strength and endurance as no other faith;

because, of its foundation in the doctrine of the Resurrection. The

resurrection is mentioned over one hundred times in the New

Testament. The resurrection is the basic, central, chief, essential,

indispensable, main, vital doctrine of the faith and testimony of

the Apostles of the Lord Jesus Christ.



Even when the apostles thought to replace Judas Iscariot, the reason

they felt it necessary to add Methias was so he might "be a witness

with us of His resurrection." In his great sermon on the Day of

Pentecost, the one point that Peter emphasized was the resurrection

of Jesus Christ. "This Jesus hath God raised up, whereof we all are

witnesses." "With great power gave the Apostles witness of the

resurrection of the Lord Jesus." The central doctrine that Paul

preached to the Greek philosophers on Mars Hill was the resurrection

of Jesus. Acts 17:18, Acts 23:6; 1 Cor 15:15.



The resurrection of Jesus Christ is one of the two fundamental

truths of the Gospel, the other being His atoning death. Paul says

in I Cor 15:1-4, Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the Gospel

which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein

ye stand; By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I

preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. For I delivered

unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ

died for our sins according to the Scriptures; And that He was

buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the

Scriptures."



That is THE Gospel. PERIOD. True Christian or Messianic believers

will NOT tolerate ANY OTHER Gospel. We have good news in this thick

antichrist gross darkness of these last days. Our good news is the

same glad tidings of the Apostles. Our good news is first, that

Christ died for our sins and made atonement; and second, that He

rose again and is alive. The crucifixion loses its meaning, without

the resurrection. Without the resurrection, the death of Christ was

only the heroic death of a noble martyr. With the resurrection, it

is the atoning death of the Son of God. It shows His death to be of

sufficient value to cover all our sins, for the resurrection proves

His death was the sacrifice of the Son of God.



What a great and blessed hope of the resurrection we do have. We can

KNOW that the greatest sin can be atoned for. Because our Yeshua,

our Passover, is God. If anyone could disprove the resurrection of

Jesus Christ, then, and ONLY then, could they prove the Christian

faith is vain. "If Christ be not risen, then is our preaching vain

and your faith is also vain. If Christ be not risen, your faith is

vain. You are yet in your sins." I Cor 15:14



Paul is talking about the bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ. This

is why we see the new breed of damnable heretics so absurdly and

viciously attacking Paul's apostleship. More and more religious

wolves are trying so hard to undermine the truth and fact that the

epistles of Paul are the Word of God. I have never met anyone trying

to say that Paul was not an Apostle, or that his writing is not the

Word of God, that did not prove themselves to be damnable heretics.

In the last days we are warned there will be many such wolves,

therefore we all need to strengthen our grip on the doctrine of the

Resurrection. The doctrine of the resurrection of Jesus Christ is

the one doctrine that has power to save any one who believes it with

the heart. If thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and

shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised Him from the dead,

thou shalt be saved. Rom 10:19 To know the power of Christ's

resurrection is one of the highest ambitions of the intelligent

believer. To know the power of Christ's resurrection the intelligent

believer will sacrifice ALL things and counts them but dung. Phil

3:8-10.





While the literal bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ is the strength

of Christian doctrine, it is also the MOST SOLID FACT of Christian

evidence. It is the certain DOWNFALL and destruction of the atheists,

unbelievers, skeptics, and damnable heretics. Because the Scriptural

assertions of Christ's resurrection can be established as historic

certainties, the claims and doctrines of Christianity rest upon the

MOST SOLID foundation. The devil and all his demonically empowered

heretics know, if the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead

cannot be established, Christianity must go.



By comparison to the Resurrection, it is a waste of time discussing

the other miracles, with the faithless unbeliever and heretic. The

essential question is, Did Jesus Christ rise from the dead? Because

if He did, it will be very easy to believe the other miracles; but if

not, the other miracles become pointless.



Are the statements contained in the four Gospels regarding the

resurrection of Jesus Christ statements of fact or are they fiction,

fables, myths? That is the central question to which EVERY person

MUST KNOW the answer. The strength of the Christian or Messianic

faith is established by the proof and how fully persuaded one is,

regarding this MOST important doctrine of the resurrection of the Son

of God. We MUST KNOW the proof that the statements contained in the

four Gospels regarding the resurrection of Jesus Christ are exact

statements of historic fact.



We should all be thankful to God that the external proofs of the

authenticity and truthfulness of the Gospels are so overwhelming.

What is so beautiful is that the child, or brand new believer, may

grab hold of the Gospel truth so simply and quickly and solidly by

FAITH. But there are other proofs too, that are so completely

overwhelming and convincing, that cause rejoicing in our faith most

solidly founded upon God's integrity.



Suppose we see what happens if we try to have a look at our wonderful

faith from the position of the heretic, scoffer, agnostic, or

unbeliever. Let us not assume anything. We will assume absolutely

nothing. We will start out with a fact, which we all know to be a

fact, namely, that we have the four Gospels today, regardless whoever

wrote them and whenever they were written. We will look at these four

Gospels side by side, and see if we can discern in them the marks of

truth or of fiction.



The first thing we see as we compare these Gospels is that they are

four separate and independent accounts. This is obvious from the

apparent discrepancies in the four different accounts, and there are

many of these apparent discrepancies. It would be impossible for

these four accounts to have been made up in collusion with one

another, or to have been derived from one another, with so many

obvious discrepancies to be found in them. There is harmony between

the four accounts, but the harmony is not readily apparent on the

surface. The harmony is only seen by continuing, lasting, lifelong,

never-ending, persistent, prolonged, and thorough study.



It is exactly such a harmony as could only come from accounts written

or related by several different persons, each looking at the events

recorded from his own standpoint. It is precisely such a harmony as

would not exist in four accounts if manufactured in collusion, or

derived one from the other. If four accounts were put together in a

scheme or conspired plan, any sort of harmony would appear on the

surface. Whatever discrepancy there might be would not be obvious but

would be seen only by careful study. The four Gospels are exactly the

opposite. Harmony is only seen by diligent careful study, and the

apparent discrepancy is obvious.



Whether true or false, intellectual honesty requires the ONLY

conclusion that these four accounts are separate and independent from

one another. Of course we understand that the four accounts also

supplement one another, the third account sometimes reconciling

apparent discrepancies between two.



These accounts must be either a record of facts that actually

occurred or else fictions. If fictions, they must have been

fabricated either by collusion or independently of one another. They

cannot have been fabricated independently of one another; because,

the agreements are too solid and there are way too many that one

could honestly think they could possibly have been fabricated.



It is absolutely astonishing. The more one studies the more obvious

is the impossibility that four persons sitting down to write an

account of what never occurred independently of one another should

have made their stories agree to the extent that these do. On the

other hand, they cannot have been fiction, in conspiracy with one

another; because, the apparent discrepancies are too numerous and too

obvious. However the inevitable conclusion of study is that the

discrepancies are only apparent and the truth is in perfect harmony

of TRUTH, simply and accurately recorded. Alleluia.



Since it is proven they could not have been made up independently of

one another. And since it is proven they were not made up in

collusion with one another. Then the only intellectually honest

conclusion is that that they were not made up at all. Yes, that is

the ONLY studied conclusion possible, that they are a true account of

facts as they actually occurred. And there is more.



Every one of these accounts bears compelling and remarkable

indications of having been eyewitness accounts. The account of an eye-

witness is easily distinguished from the account of one who is

retelling or giving hearsay accounts of what others have told him.

Any one who deals with evidence in court or in historical study soon

learns how to distinguish the report of an eyewitness from mere

hearsay evidence. Study of the Gospel records of the resurrection

will quickly show many marks of the eyewitness. Any one who carefully

reads the Gospels will conclude that the Gospels are eyewitness

accounts and not hearsay.



The Gospel narratives are so natural, straightforward, and simple.

Even though the Gospels are relating events that are supernatural,

the accounts themselves are very natural, simple, and direct. There

is no coloring or anything but the simple, straightforward telling of

facts as they actually were observed to happen. The certainty of the

evidence presented by the four different eyewitnesses Gospel accounts

are astonishing in simplicity and directness. Yet the four

independent witnesses, being so simple and direct about the same

facts, with the only variation seen in the details, one adding what

the other missed, with the third witness reconciling the apparent

discrepancies, can lead to only one conclusion. TRUTH. And such truth

would require the inspiration of the INFINATELY capable Holy Spirit

of Truth to work through four different eyewitnesses.



The four writers of the Gospel accounts of the resurrection of Christ

do not seem to have been at all concerned about the meaning or

bearing of many of the facts that they recorded. They simply tell

right out what they saw in all simplicity and straightforwardness,

leaving to others the comprehension, explanation, or interpretation.

The simplicity, plainness, and unsophisticated manner of the four

accounts of the first appearance of Jesus after His crucifixion, is

astonishing. The simplicity alone emphasizes the essentially pure,

truth of these resurrection accounts.



Suppose we found four accounts of the battle of Gettysburg, not

knowing anything about the authors of those four accounts. Then when

we laid them side by side, we found that they were obviously and

plainly and manifestly independent accounts. We also could tell that

they were from eyewitnesses. Let us say we found them all having that

straightforwardness and simplicity characteristic in eye-witness

accounts, while apparently disagreeing in minor details, yet they

agreed substantially in their overall account of the battle. Even

though we had no idea of who wrote the accounts, or when the accounts

were written, without any other accounts, then one would conclude

that we have a true account of the battle of Gettysburg. This is

exactly the same situation with the four Gospel accounts of the

Resurrection.



The four accounts are obviously separate and independent from one

another, bearing the clear marks of having been derived from eye

witnesses, characterized by an astonishing simplicity and

straightforwardness, apparently disagreeing in minor details, but in

perfect agreement as to the great central facts recorded. If we are

intellectually honest, if we follow the rules of evidence followed in

court, if we follow the principles of honest literary or historical

criticism, one can NOT avoid the conclusion that this is a true

account of the resurrection of Jesus. Yet there is more regarding the

evidence and proof of the resurrection of Jesus from the dead.





There is quite obvious yet unintentional evidence of words, phrases,

and accidental details about the fact of the Resurrection. Sometimes

the unintentional evidence of a witness in his phrases, and by

accidental details that he gives, can even be more convincing than

his direct testimony. That is because it is not the testimony of the

witness, but a testimony of the truth to itself. The Gospel accounts

abound in this sort of evidence.



There is the astonishing fact that in all the Gospel records of the

resurrection, we are given to understand that Jesus was not at first

recognized by His disciples, when He appeared to them after His

resurrection, like in Luke 24:16 and John 21:4. No explanation is

given for this. But when we think about it, we soon see why it was

so. But the Gospels simply record the fact, without attempting to

explain it. If the stories were made up or were fiction, they

certainly would never have been made up in this way. The writer

would have seen at once the objection that would arise in the minds

of those who did NOT wish to believe in His resurrection. Those who

did not want to believe, would be quick to say, it was not really

Jesus whom the disciples saw. Why then, is the story told in this

way? The reason is self-evident. The Gospel writers were not making

up a story for effect, but simply recording events precisely as they

occurred. This is just simply what happened. That is the ONLY reason

by the inspiration of the Spirit of Truth that this is the way in

which they told it. It is not a fabrication of imaginary incidents.

It quite simply and unavoidably is an exact record of facts

carefully observed and accurately recorded.



Consider also that in all the Gospel records of the appearances of

Jesus after His resurrection, there is not a single recorded

appearance to an enemy or opponent of Christ. All His appearances

were to those who were already believers. Why this was so, should

also be obvious. However, why this is so is not found in any of the

Gospels. If the stories had been fabricated, they certainly would

never have been made up in this way. Just assume the Gospels were

made up, hundreds of years after the events recorded, when all the

people were dead and gone, and no one could stand against any lies

told. If that false assumption were true, then the fabrication would

certainly have had Jesus appear, and to confound some of His enemies

like Caiaphas, Pilate, or Herod. But there is nothing like this in

any of the Gospel records. Every appearance is to one who is already

a believer. It is obvious why this is so. It can only be that it

simply was the way that things happened, and the Gospel records are

not concerned with producing a story for any effect. The Gospel

accounts of the Resurrection are simply and obviously only concerned

with recording the events precisely and exactly as they happened.

This is just how simple, honest, eyewitnesses saw and recorded what

they saw actually happen.



We should also notice the fact that the recorded appearances of

Jesus after His resurrection were only occasional. He would appear

in the midst of His disciples and disappear. He might not be seen

again perhaps for several days. Why He did this was to gradually

prepare them for His ascension to take His seat at the Fathers right

hand in the highest throne in the third heaven. He was gently

preparing them for the separation from their old-time communion with

Him in the body, to prepare them for the communion with Himself in

the Spirit. Yet, still we are not told this in the Gospel records.

Yet, even those who do not know Jesus would see how obvious that

this fact is. All are left to figure it out for ourselves, and again

it is all the more significant for that reason. The disciples

themselves probably did not realize the meaning of this in those 40

days between the Resurrection and Ascension. If they had been making

up the story there is little doubt that they would have had Jesus as

being with them constantly, every day. Again, the obvious reason of

why the account is told as recorded in the four Gospels, is because

this is the way in which it had all occurred. The Gospel writers are

simply concerned with giving the exact record of the facts as

witnessed by themselves and others.



Did you ever think about the words of Jesus to Mary at their first

meeting, in John 20:17? Jesus said to Mary, "Touch me not, for I am

not yet ascended to My Father." We are not told why Jesus said this

to Mary. We are left to discover the reason for it, IF WE CAN. A lot

of common taters have had a tough time figuring it out. Why is this

short saying of Jesus put in the Gospel without a word of

explanation? Certainly a writer making up a story would not put in a

little detail like that without any obvious meaning and without any

attempt to explain it. Stories that are made up are made up for a

purpose. Details in fiction are inserted for a purpose, a purpose

more or less evident. However, in nearly twenty centuries of study

the best of the common taters have not been able to find out the

purpose why this was inserted. Lots of guesses, but nothing that

rings in my spirit by the Spirit of Truth. Why then do we find it in

the Gospel? Because this is exactly what happened. This is what

Jesus said; this is what Mary heard Jesus say; this is what Mary

told, and therefore this is what John recorded. Just some more very

strong proof that this can not be fiction. That little statement

proves an accurate historical record of fact. The only view

regarding the statement that should be beyond argument is that it

must be an accurate record of the words spoken by Jesus after His

resurrection.



Remember Peter and Johns footrace to the tomb? "So they ran both

together; and the other disciple did outrun Peter, and came first to

the sepulcher. And he, stooping down and looking in, saw the linen

clothes lying; yet went he not in. Then cometh Simon Peter following

him, and went into the sepulcher, and seeth the linen Clothes lie."

Mary had run to bring the bad news from the tomb, because she did

not know the good news. She cries, "They have taken away the Lord

out of the sepulcher, and we know not where they have laid Him."

John and Peter immediately ran as fast as they could run to the

tomb. John, is faster, he outran Peter, and reached the tomb first.

But as the younger and submitted and in respect of Peter did not

enter the tomb. Waiting for Peter's confirmation of what they should

do, John simply stooped down and looked in. Peter gets there as fast

as he can, and when he gets to the tomb, he has no hesitation and

goes directly into the tomb. This is the writing of a fisherman, and

it is simply not conceivable that it could be made up, it is simply

what happened. It would take someone with greater literary ability

than Shakespeare to make this up. This is simply how it was, just as

the the two fishermen saw and experienced it. If one visits the REAL

Tomb today, the tomb which scholars now know, as the real burial

place of Jesus, one will find oneself unconsciously stooped down

when looking in. Yes, it is a very real place, still there, and you

can, and will know its reality. It is amazing how its reality and

simplicity has been preserved.





The study of the Gospel accounts of those 40 days between the

Resurrection and Ascension is full of wonderful simple pure faith

building TRUTH. As soon as Mary saw the stone rolled away she ran to

tell the disciples Peter and John. She obviously went back after she

had run to tell Peter and John the bad news that she thought someone

had taken the body of the Lord. In John 20:15 Jesus saith unto her,

Woman, why weepest thou? whom seekest thou? She, supposing Him to be

the gardener, saith unto Him, Sir, if thou hast borne Him hence, tell

me where thou hast laid Him, and I will take Him away."



Mary had gone into the city and notified John and Peter that she had

found the sepulcher empty. Peter and John foot race to the tomb and

since Mary has already made the trip before, we know they are back at

the tomb way ahead of Mary's return. Mary is thinking bad news, she

was there Wednesday. She saw what John saw when the Centurion had

thrust the spear into His side, she too had seen the separated blood

AND water come out. NO MORE CERTAIN PROOF OF DEATH, ABSOLUTE PROOF

POSITIVE HIS HEART HAD BEEN PIERCED BY THAT SPEAR. All Mary can think

is the bad news she had to rush to tell Peter and John. She is not in

any sort of hurry like Peter and John were. Mary is makeing her

SECOND trip IN THE GRIEF AND DARKNESS OF SATURDAY NIGHT. YES SATURDAY

NIGHT MAKING HER SECOND TRIP TO THE EMPTY TOMB.



Mary has a heavy heart and her feet are dragging on this second

SATURDAY night trip to the tomb. Peter and John have left by the time

Mary gets there. She is full of grief thinking that not only has her

beloved Lord been killed on that cross Wednesday, but that now as

soon as she could possibly have gotten there when it got dark

SATURDAY, His tomb has been desecrated. She gets there this second

time in the darkness of Saturday night, before daylight of Sunday.

She stands outside of the tomb weeping. She see two angels sitting in

the tomb, one at the head and the other at the feet where the body of

Jesus had lain. But the grief-stricken woman has so much grief she

would not recognize an angel to be an angel. The angels say unto

her, "Woman, why weepest thou?" She says, "Because they have taken

away my Lord, and I know not where they have laid Him." She hears

something behind her in the darkness of Saturday night and she turns

around to see who is coming. She sees Jesus standing there, but, it

is still in the darkness of Saturday night and there is no daylight

of Sunday yet. In such darkness and grief, she does not recognize her

Lord. Then Jesus also says to her, "Why weepest thou? Whom seekest

thou?" She, supposing it to be the gardener who is talking to her,

says, "Sir, if thou hast borne Him hence, tell me where thou hast

laid Him and I will take Him away."



This is Mary who makes this offer, a weary woman full of grief. Here

is a woman loaded with grief, who probably had no sleep since she saw

her Lord be crucified on Wednesday. Mary is offering to carry a full

grown man away. Of course, she could not do it, but with such great

love and grief for her Lord she can not think of her weakness and the

impossibility of what she is saying. There is something that must be

done. There was the preparation of her Lord's dead body. That was the

reality that was consuming Mary's mind.



She handled her Lord's dead body on Wednesday. But, she could only

BEGIN, not even barely begin the preparation of His body on

Wednesday. Then Thurdsday, Nissan 15, was the Sabbath of Passover,

and she could not go to the tomb to finish the burial preparation.

Then Friday, Nissan 16, the Sabbath of the first day of Unleavened

Bread, and she could not go to the tomb to finish the burial

preparation. Then Saturday, the High Sabbath of the Feast of

Unleavened Bread, and she could not go to the tomb to finish the

burial. So now it is finally dark on Saturday.



Finally, it is dark Saturday, and she can go and finish this only

thing that consumed her mind since Wednesday Nissan 14. She has

probably not slept since she had to stop the burial preparations that

she could only begin to start on Wednesday. This preparation of the

body and proper burial has to be done and she says, "I will do

it," "Tell me where thou hast laid Him, and I will take Him away." A

fiction, NO WAY, this is reality. This is THE TRUTH, how it actually

was.



As a fisherman I can tell you that if one was going to catch anything

with nets from the clear waters of the Sea of Galilee, it must be

done at night, especially almost 2000 years before monofiliment

polymer line for nets. Results in the daylight will be zero, zip,

nada. In John 21:7 we read - Therefore, that disciple whom Jesus

loved saith to Peter, It is the Lord. Now when Simon Peter heard that

it was the Lord, he girt his fisher's coat unto him, (for he was

naked,) and did cast himself into the sea. Brethren this is a true

account. No fisherman likes to admit the truth of not catching

anything. That fisherman that the Lord loved was telling the truth.

The Apostles had gone to Galilee. The Lord had told them to go there

and that He would meet them there. Once the fishermen are back in

Galilee what better way to pass the time till the Lord meets with

them. Simon Peter, and all fishermen understand this passion,

says, "I go a-fishing." The others are fishermen too and say, "We

also go with thee."



All fishermen are liars except me, and you, and John. Yup, I am not

sure about you either. But there is not any doubt in my mind, John

was telling the truth; because, he said they caught nothing. In the

early dawn Jesus is on the shore, near where they are wrapping up

their fishless night's effort. There is not much daylight and the

fishermen did not recognize Him. Then Jesus calls to them, "Children,

have ye any meat?" And they answer, "No." He tells them to cast the

net on the right side of the ship and they will find. WHAT A

FANTASTIC FISHING GUIDE – if you are a fisherman you got to love

Jesus. Uncharacteristic of professional fishermen unless they have

been humbled by long effort with no fish, they just do what He said.

WHAT A FISHING GUIDE. Alleluia, they have such a huge catch they were

not able to draw it, their net is loaded with fishes. John says, "It

is the Lord." Peter, is already moving as soon as he hears John,

grabbing his fisher's coat he covers his naked body and throws

himself overboard and swims for shore to reach his Lord.



Is this fiction or real? Brethren, this is real. Fishermen do not

like to put it in writing even if it is true that they caught no

fish. When the fisherman writes the story he will tell you about the

big one that got away, but not how he fished all night and got

skunked, not in writing. This is not fiction. Do not forget that a

fisherman wrote this. The fisherman might make up a good fish story

but not even Shakespeare, Mark Twain, and Charles Dickens putting

their heads together could make up something like this fisherman

wrote, regarding Mary's two trips to the tomb Saturday night. As far

as anything ever written to touch a heart this beats anything any man

could come up with, apart from pure simple truth by the Spirit of

Truth.





Mark, the writer of the Gospel of Mark, was Peter's nephew, the same

John-Mark who went on the missionary journeys with Paul and Baranbus.

Yes, he was a fisherman too. In Mark 16:7 he writes, "But go your

way, tell His disciples and Peter that He goeth before you into

Galilee: there shall ye see Him, as He said unto you," Why was

that "and Peter" mentioned? Everyone knows Peter is one of the

disciples. In fact, he was thought by many to be chief the apostolic

group though he was actually in submission to James. Why is that

special mention of telling the disciples "and Peter?" No explanation

is given. Again, it does not take much deep thought to see it was the

message of love toward the despondent, despairing disciple who had

three times denied his Lord. If the message had been simply to the

disciples Peter might have said, "Yes, I was once a disciple, but I

can no longer be counted a disciple. I denied my Lord three times

during His trial that night by the Sanhedrin, even with oaths and

curses. The invitation does not include me." But our compassionate

Lord had His angel messenger explicity include Peter with the

disciples in the instruction.



Go tell My disciples, and be sure to tell poor, weak, broken-hearted

Peter. No way is this fiction, this is a real picture of our Lord.

Those who know Him know it is, and those who continue to search the

gospel truth, wanting to know the truth, about the resurrection will

know too. The man whose mind is not sharp enough to see this is not

fiction but simple truth from simple fishermen, is to be pitied. It

is difficult to imagine this is fiction.



We should recognize that this is recorded only in the Gospel of Mark,

which is well known to be Peter's Gospel. As Peter dictated to Mark

what he should record, Peter probably had tears in his eyes to match

his grateful heart. Peter probably told Mark to be sure you put that

in how the Lord had His angel specifically instructed, "and Peter" so

that Peter would know that he was still to be included as part of the

company of His disciples.



In, Jon 21:15-17, John also describes the meeting on the shore of the

Sea of Galilee. "So when they had dined, Jesus saith to Simon Peter,

Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me more than these? He saith unto

Him, Yea, Lord; Thou knowest that I love Thee. He saith unto him,

Feed My lambs. He saith unto him again the second time, Simon, son of

Jonas, lovest thou Me? He saith unto Him, Yea, Lord, Thou knowest

that I love Thee. He saith unto him, Feed My sheep. He saith unto him

the third time, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou Me? Peter was

grieved because He said unto him the third time, Lovest thou Me? And

he said unto Him, Lord, Thou knowest all things; Thou knowest that I

love Thee. Jesus saith unto him, Feed My sheep." We should take note

of the words, "Peter was grieved because He said unto him the third

time, Lovest thou Me?" Why did Jesus ask Peter three times, "Lovest

thou Me?" And why was Peter grieved because Jesus did ask him three

times? We are not told here. But, if we read this knowing of Peter's

three denials of his Lord, we will understand it. Since Peter had

denied his Lord three times, Jesus three times gave Peter an

opportunity to reassert his love. Peter remembers that nightmare

when, three times, in the courtyard of Annas and Caiaphas, he did

denied his Lord. "Peter was grieved because He said unto him the

third time, Lovest thou Me." Is John making this up? NO WAY. This is

plain simple truth written by a simple fisherman. John simply reports

what actually happened.



This is one place where the Greek words show even more light on this

pure simple truth than the English of the promised Seventh

purification in English. In Greek we see the two different words are

used for "love." When Jesus, asked Peter, "Lovest thou Me?", He used

a strong word denoting the higher form of love. Peter

replying, "Lord, Thou knowest that I love Thee," uses a weaker word,

but one denoting a more tender form of love. Jesus, the second time

uses the stronger word, and the second time in his reply Peter uses

the weaker word. In His third question, Jesus comes down to Peter's

level and uses the weaker word that Peter had used from the

beginning. Then Peter replies, "Lord, Thou knowest all things, Thou

knowest that I love Thee," using the same weaker word. Fiction, NO, a

thousand times NO, it is simply the plain accurately reported truth

and just the facts that happened.



Truth is the issue. We always respect the honest doubter. Honest

doubt is often part of the quest for truth. Proud vain contempt of

facts is not part of the seeking of truth. The Apostle Thomas is the

classic honest doubter. What happened to Thomas is what happens to

the honest doubter when diligently searching for the truth of the

resurrection. In John 20:27-29 we see the honest doubter

Thomas. "Then saith he to Thomas, Reach hither thy finger, and behold

my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and thrust it into my side: and

be not faithless, but believing. And Thomas answered and said unto

Him, My Lord and my God. Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, because thou

hast seen Me, thou hast believed: blessed are they that have not

seen, and yet have believed."



Here we see the action of Thomas and the rebuke of Jesus. John the

fisherman wrote this which is too characteristic to be anything other

than the simple truth. Only the one without regard for truth

violating all principles of logical thought could imagine this to be

the work of some master of fiction. Thomas had not been with the

disciples at the first Sabbath appearance of our Lord the last

Saturday. A week had passed by. Another Lord's Day had come. This

Sabbath, Thomas makes sure of being present with the other disciples.

This Sabbath, if the Lord is to appear, he will be there.



If he had been like some of our modern scoffers, he would have taken

pains to be away. However, though Thomas was a doubter, he was an

honest doubter. The honest doubter wants to know the truth, unlike

the scoffer who has contempt of the truth. Suddenly Jesus is just

there standing among them. He says to Thomas, "Reach hither thy

finger, and behold My hands, and reach thither thy hand; and thrust

it into My side: and be not faithless but believing." Thomas sees

Him, and the faith held back by his honest doubting, breaks wide

open. There is nothing stopping the honest doubter who has now has

his faith unrestrained. This bursting forth of Thomas' faith takes

Thomas farther and higher than any other disciple had as yet reached.

Thomas instantly and without hesitation cries out as he looks up into

the face of Jesus, "My Lord and My God!"



We should not miss how that Jesus then tenderly, yet thoroughly,

tests and proves Thomas's faith, as He rebukes him. He says, "Thomas,

because thou hast seen Me, thou hast believed. "Blessed are they that

have not seen and yet have believed."



People of Faith, are indeed much more blessed. People of faith are so

eager to find, and so quick to see, and so ready to accept the truth,

that they do not wait for actual visible demonstrations. People of

faith are ready to take truth on sufficient testimony. Yet often such

people of faith are ridiculed and abused. However, respect MUST be

given to the honest doubter.



By now, this question should even rock the hardened scoffer - Is this

made up, or is this simple truth? Is it a record of facts as they

occurred, or a fictitious production of some master fiction writer?

There is no doubting left for the honest doubter. This is just the

plain simple accurate report of the simple fisherman telling the

truth of what happened. Yet there is so much more. Glory to God. We

are so blessed to have our faith based upon the integrity of the Word

of God, who is The Way, The Truth, and the The Resurrection

PERSONIFIED. Alleluia Yeshua.





Have you determined why Jesus said to said to Mary, "Touch me not;

for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and

say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my

God, and your God." That is OK, that is good in fact, that is humble

truthfulness in fact. To be sure a lot of common taters THINK they

know, but no one really KNOWS in fullness. We only KNOW by the more

sure word which is written and that simply is NOT written.



In the verse before that, John 20:16, Jesus saith unto her, Mary.

She turned herself, and saith unto him, Rabboni; which is to say,

Master. A very delicate touch for the fisherman reporter unless he

is simply telling the simple truth of what happened.



Mary is standing outside the tomb overcome with grief. She has not

recognized her Lord, though He has spoken to her. She has mistaken

Him for the gardener: She has said, "Sir, if thou hast borne Him

hence, tell me where thou hast laid Him, and I will take Him away."

Then Jesus says just one word. He says, "Mary." Mary regardless of

her depth of grief and confusion she could NEVER forget how her

Master called her name. No one else could say her name as she knew

He did, like no one else. Instanty she knew, her eyes were opened.

She falls at His feet and tries to reach for Him, and looks up into

His face, and cries, "Rabboni, my Master." Is this made up?

Impossible! This is life, this is the truth, this is simply what

happened.



This is Jesus, the Lord, and this is Mary, a woman who loved Him. It

would take a thousand times more faith to believe that some unknown

author of the second, third, or fourth century, could have produced

such a masterpiece, if this were fiction. John the simple fisherman

simply tells us the simple fact of what happened. This is reality,

life, a simple report of an encounter of Yeshua and Mary. This is

Mary that John knew so well, who brought him and Peter the first

report of the empty tomb Saturday night. It simply never occurred to

him that us readers almost 2000 years later might like to know which

Mary this was, but we can only think we know. No fiction writer

could be that simple.



Who was this Mary? Books can and have written about that question.

It is widely agreed that it was NOT His mother Mary. A tradition,

with absolutely no scriptural foundation, and only propagated after

about 500 AD, says it was Mary Magdelene. However, there is no solid

scriptural connection between the sinful woman of Luke 7:36-50 and

the Mary Magdelene. The FACT is we are NOT told. The fact is that

there is no biblical, and only traditions embelished by Hollywood,

that the sinful woman of Luke 7 is Mary Magdelene out of whom the

Lord had cast seven devils.



We have regressed from what people knew very well in bible times,

that demon possession was just as much an indication of physical

illness, as it is an indication of mental or spiritual illness.

Obviously, Mary Magdalene was quite ill before meeting with Jesus.

The identity of this Mary at the tomb, an imporant detail which any

and ALL fiction writers would most certainly have supplied, is

simply not given in the account. This is how a simple fisherman

might report the truth. From the report no one KNOWS.



Many think they know but the fact is no one knows from the Gospel

accounts. One is just as correct to believe this Mary to be any of

three or four people named Mary. There were at least four people we

KNOW named Mary who witnessed the crucifixion. Yes, at least four

women named Mary likely helped with the burial which had NO time to

be completed before the Thursday Sabbath of Passover of Nissan 15,

which began at dark of Wednesday Nissan 14, 30 AD. Mary the sister

of Martha and Lazarus, OR Mary the mother of Mark, OR Mary the wife

of Cleopas, all of whom likely witnessed the death and helped with

the rushed burial of Yeshua THE Messiah.



Someone might and probably will say, all these are little things.

True, and it is from that very fact that they gain much of their

significance. It is just in such little things that fiction would

disclose itself. Fiction displays itself different from fact in the

smallest details. If one is just giving a great story it is quite

easy to make fiction look like truth. However, when one examines the

smallest details, that is where one quickly can detect that it is

not reality but cleverly made up fiction. There is nothing clever

about any of the four Gospel accounts. That is even obvious on the

surface. However, the more careful one is to check the smaller

details of the Gospel records, the more one becomes impressed with

their simple truthfulness. They are anything but clever. They are

plain, simple, artless, natural, casual, and matter of fact. They

have a self-evident truthfulness down to the smallest detail, that

surpasses all the possibilities of art or fiction, and resounds in

simple TRUTH.



Maybe some of you have noticed that so far we have not even given

any consideration of the Circumstantial Evidence for the

Resurrection. Some of the circumstantial evidence is quite

compelling proof, and as the Holy Bible says, there were many

infallible proofs witnessed in those 40 days after His Resurrection

on Saturday, Nissan 17, 30 AD. These proofs are recorded in the four

Gospels regarding the resurrection of Jesus Christ, so simply, that

they simply are exact statements of historic fact. There are certain

proven and admitted facts that demand the resurrection of Christ to

account for them.



First is the simple history that THE foundation truth preached in

the early years of the Church's history was the resurrection. This

was the one doctrine upon which the Apostles were always preaching.

Whether Jesus did actually rise from the dead or not, it is certain

that the ONE thing that the Apostles constantly proclaimed was that

He had risen. Why should the Apostles use this as the very corner-

stone of their creed, if not well attested and firmly believed?



However, much more important than that is the FACT that they ALL

gave their lives, with the possible exception of John, for this

doctrine. Men never lay down their lives for a doctrine which they

do not firmly believe. They stated that they had seen Jesus after

His resurrection, and rather than give up their statement, they laid

down their lives for it. Sure there are many men who have died for

error, but it was for error that they firmly believed. What we do

know is that these Apostles would have known whether they had seen

Jesus or not. That means they would not merely have been dying for

error; but dying for a statement which they KNEW to be false. This

would be more than incredible, but in fact, impossible.



If the Apostles really firmly believed, as they admitted, that Jesus

rose from the dead, they had some facts upon which they founded

their belief. These are the facts that they have given in the Gospel

accounts. If the facts were as reported in the Gospels, there is no

possible escaping the conclusion that Jesus actually arose.



We should also understand that if Jesus had not arisen, there would

have been evidence that He had not. His enemies would have produced

such evidence, namely the dead body. However, the Apostles went up

and down in the very city where He had been crucified and proclaimed

right to the faces of the people who had compelled the Romans to

crucify Him, proclaiming that He had been raised. NO one could

produce evidence to the contrary, because He was alive. The very

best they could do was to say the guards went to sleep and the

disciples stole the body while the guards slept. Sleeping men do NOT

make good witnesses. If the disciples had stolen the body, they

would have known it themselves, and ALL of the Apostles, and many

other disciples would NOT have not have been ready to die for what

they knew to be a hoax.



The most compelling evidence of all is the change in the disciples

themselves, the moral transformation. At the time of the crucifixion

of the Messiah, every single apostle and disciple was filled with

hopelessness, misery, sorrow, grief and total despair. Peter, hands

down leader in the boldness department is found denying his Lord

three times with oaths and curses. This same Peter just a few days

later is full of boldness and courage that no threatening, beating,

imprisonment could stop. Finally Peter died the martyrs death for

the proclamation of the Gospel truth of the Resurrection of THE

Messiah. Nothing could shake Peter's confidence in the Resurrection.

In Acts 4:10, he stands before the same people that had condemned

Yeshua to death and tells them, "Be it known unto you all, and to

all the people of Israel, that by the name of Jesus Christ of

Nazareth, whom ye crucified, whom God raised from the dead, even by

Him doth this man stand before you whole." The council commands

Peter not to speak at all nor teach in the name of Jesus, and Peter

answers in Acts 4:19-20, "Whether it be right in the sight of God to

hearken unto you more than unto God, judge ye. For we cannot but

speak the things which we have seen and heard."



Something happened to change that man who had three times denied his

Messiah to save his own life. The same council who crucified his

Messiah arrest him and put him in prison. Peter is in real genuine

danger of death, is brought before that council, replies to their

demand that he should be silent regarding Yeshua, in Acts 5:29-32

says, "We ought to obey God rather than man. The God of our fathers

raised up Jesus whom ye slew and hanged on a tree. Him hath God

exalted with His right hand to be a Prince and a Saviour, for to

give repentance to Israel, and forgiveness of sins. And we are His

witnesses of these things."



Nothing other than the power of the resurrection of Messiah Yeshua

can account for such a total and astonishing complete moral change

of the man. Only the fact and truth of the resurrection, and of

actually having seen the risen Messiah can explain it.





These unquestionable facts are so impressive and so conclusive that honest scholars Jew and Gentile are forced to admit that the Apostles believed that Jesus rose from the dead. One can not otherwise claim honest scholarship. Some want to stop there absurdly try to speak of hallucinations or other reasons for the faith of the Apostles in the resurrection. It is absurd that eleven men would having the same vision or hallucination at the same time, not to mention how absurd it would be to say five hundred men of I Cor 15:6, having the same vision at the same time.



Some who will not study the truth might try to explain that Yeshua was not really dead when they took Him from the cross. Some have tried to say that His friends resuscitated Him and brought Him back to life. Some really do try to say that Yeshua did not really die on that cross, which is a high level Satanic and occult basis of belief. One might say it is the most prominent antichrist theory of the last days to deny the reality of the Messiah Yeshua’s resurrection. All such are quick to point to the short time Jesus hung on the cross. Many may cite where Josephus spoke of someone taken down from the cross and nursed back to life.



Those who follow that line of absurd occult doctrine forget what happened to the Messiah BEFORE He was nailed to that cross on Wednesday, Nissan 14, in 30 AD. They forget the agony in the garden of Gethsemane, They forget the four trials and the scourging. They forget about the physical condition resulting from the hours before Yeshua was nailed to that cross outside the walls of Jerusalem. They FORGET the water and the blood that poured from His pierced side. There is no more positive proof of the heart being pierced than when the blood serum in spleen separates to blood and water.



If Yeshua could have been resuscitated, He would have been a complete total physical wreck. The officer who was supposed to have survived crucifixion in the time of Josephus, had not been scourged prior to the cross. That officer had NOT BEEN PIERCED BY A SPEAR - NO BLOOD AND WATER coming out. The reported officer though brought back to life, was a complete total physical wreck. One of the biggest problems with such an absurd theory is that if the Apostles and friends of the Messiah, who are the ones who are supposed to have brought Him back to life, would have known how they brought Him back to life. His friends would have known. They did NOT preach the resuscitation. They ALL preached the resurrection to their death as martyrs. BLOOD AND WATER came out. Indeed dead men do not bleed. But if a dead man’s heart gets pierced there will be blood AND WATER coming from the ruptured membrane sac filled with blood serum fluid that encloses the heart and the roots of the aorta and other large blood vessels. That sac is called pericardium. When the heart is ruptured, the serum in the pericardium IMMEDIATELY SEPARATES to BLOOD AND WATER. If the heart were ruptured when a dead man’s pericardium is pierced BLOOD AND WATER will come out. There is no more positive proof of death than when BLOOD AND WATER come out of the side of a body pierced while hanging on a cross. Yeshua was really dead and that BLOOD AND WATER that flowed from that pierced side on the cross is the MOST POSITIVE PROOF OF DEATH AND IMPOSSIBILITY OF RESUSCITATON.



We should also remember how His enemies were willing to VIOLATE THE SABBATH OF PASSOVER, on Thursday, Nissan 15, to go to Pilot as Matthew the tax collector Apostle told us in chapter 27:62-66. Now the next day, that followed the day of the preparation, the chief priests and Pharisees came together unto Pilate, Saying, Sir, we remember that that deceiver said, while he was yet alive, After three days I will rise again. Command therefore that the sepulchre be made sure until the third day, lest his disciples come by night, and steal him away, and say unto the people, He is risen from the dead: so the last error shall be worse than the first. Pilate said unto them, Ye have a watch: go your way, make it as sure as ye can. So they went, and made the sepulchre sure, sealing the stone, and setting a watch. His enemies wanted Yeshua THE Messiah, dead and those particular Jewish religious leaders were willing to violate the Sabbath of Passover to make sure Messiah not only was dead but that they and ONLY they would have control of access to that dead body of the Messiah.



Yeshua the Messiah really was raised from the dead, on SATURDAY, the Sabbath, Nissan 17, 30 AD. Yeshua THE Messiah, was very positively slain as the Lamb of God which Abraham had prophesied. In Yeshua the Messiah, God did provide Himself, a Lamb, for Sinners slain, on Wednesday, Nissan 14, 30 AD outside of the gates of Jerusalem. The resurrection of the Messiah on Saturday, the Sabbath of Nissan 17, in 30 AD is the most solidly proven fact and truth of all history. There is no other possible conclusion of honest study of that truth. Jesus really was raised from the dead the third day as recorded in the four Gospels. The absurdities produced by those who try to deny that truth of the resurrection is itself even a proof of the fact. Every independent line of argument in truth will lead decisively and conclusively to the resurrection of Messiah Yeshua from the dead.



If one is determined not to believe, no amount of proof will convince him. What is so sad is how many have never had opportunity to know the good news of the Gospel of death and resurrection of Yeshua. Those who choose denial of that truth must be left to his own deliberate choice of error and falsehood. However anyone who really desires to know the truth, with honest study must accept the resurrection of Messiah as an historically proven fact.



Just as Abraham had prophesied, "God will provide Himself, a Lamb," is a historically fulfilled fact. The resurrection of the prophesied Lamb of God, is the most solid fact of history. The Blood of Lamb of God, was shed on a Roman cross outside the gates of Jerusalem on Wednesday, Nissan 14, 30 AD. Three days later on Saturday, the Sabbath, Nissan 17, 30 AD He was resurrected. The good news of the Gospel is that Messiah was delivered for our offences, and was raised again for our justification. Knowing this FACT, how shall we then live? The just shall live by FAITH. Faith is to KNOW what God has said, and to DO what God said, just because God said so. Know the Lord, cleave to the Lord, obey the Lord. Love the Lord, cleave to the Lord, obey the Lord. To know Him is to love Him, for God IS Love. He said if you love Me, KEEP My Commandments, John 14:15.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...