Question:
What was the worst part hit in the blitz?
?
2013-10-20 10:51:41 UTC
I have a history assignment and i'm not getting many facts, so does anyone know what part of Britain was hit the worst during the blitz in WW2? Also in your opinion, do you think the blitz were a success and do you think the Brits responded in a good or bad world or why? Thanks x
Ten answers:
Salty dog
2013-10-21 00:23:35 UTC
The worst hit area was East London,at that time some of the following were part of Essex. Plaistow, Stratford,Custom House,Silver Town,Mile End, Canning Town,Bow, also called the Docklands. The area was density populated by Cockney industrial workers.The Cockneys took the brunt of the blitz in their stride and their courage was such, that others that had not experience the devastation and terror of being bombed, could only walk in their shadow. Unlike the people of Malta who received a medal for their collective valour under fire, the Cockneys and worker of the other bombed industrial areas received, in spite of their courage under fire, no no such recognition.



The blitzes did disrupted production and the lose of stores due to warehouses fires and ships sunk while docked in the docklands, had a short term effect only.





As for the response by the Brits to the bombing, most were full of patriotic bravado, but then again most were tucked-safely-away in other parts of Britain, fare away from the bombed industrial areas of Birmingham, Liverpool, Coventry and the Cockney's in their Docklands.



It was those people that showed true valour in the face of terror, a valour that when addressing the rest of the nation, Churchill would use in his propaganda, thus making everybody feed that they were heroes.However the King and Queen did on more that one occasion visit the bombed out areas and those that lived there, their visits gave a great moral boost to both those that suffered and to the rest on the nation.





Churchill visited the Docklands once and they reacted by booing swearing curses at him, he would never return and the incident would be kept out of the press.
?
2013-10-21 09:33:36 UTC
Certain parts of London suffered very severely, but some smaller cities experienced proportionally worse devastation, Coventry, Bristol and Plymouth being good examples.

On Good Friday 1941, I watched the city of Bristol burning below me, from a garden in Clifton where, as an 18-year-old Volunteer in the Home Guard, I was "guarding" a very large unexploded bomb - and hoping that it wasn't on a time-fuse. (Actually I was on "anti-looting patrol", but we weren't allowed to call it that.) This was just one of a series of raids which devastated the city to such an extent that it had to be re-built after the War to an entirely different plan, and similarly the lay-out of present-day Plymouth is quite different from the pre-War one.

These raids though were not a success for Germany - in Bristol, the City Docks continued to operate, and the huge Bristol Aeroplane Company factory and the Docks and Oil Storage Depot at Avonmouth were hardly damaged.

This was due to the fact that the Luftwaffe was neither equipped nor trained for "city-bombing" at night - it was designed for close support of armies on the ground, and its small twin-engined aircraft like the Heinkel 111, the Dornier 17, and the Junkers 88 could carry only small bomb-loads.

Consequently its raids were mere pin-pricks when compared with the RAF's 1,000-bomber ones, using the big 4-engined "Lancasters", which carried huge HE bombs and thousands if incendiaries.

Also, the RAF, as early as 1917, had realized that Docks, factories etc. were targets too small to be hit accurately. It had therefore developed the tactic of "de-housing" (wonderful euphemism !) the workers by "carpet-bombing" the wide residential areas of German cities, killing very many more "innocent civilians" in one place on one night than did the Luftwaffe in Britain throughout the whole War.

How did we respond to the raids ? Well we just put up with them of course - what else COULD we do ? And we knew that we'd win in the end - because we always DID !
anonymous
2013-10-21 17:32:54 UTC
The worst hit Strategically id say was Coventry as it was the center of the industrial heart of England.

It was responsible for the production and design of many military weapons as well as cars and transport, aero engines, marine, and tank, engines and gearboxes, and large bore naval weapons (ships guns) it also had a huge Naval ordinance depot that produced and filled up to 16" shells and Ariel bombs as well as torpedoes. It was very luckily not hit at all. Had it been hit there would have been NO MORE Coventry.

Coventry's production ability was devastated in three nights of continual bombing. Its city center for a radius of a mile was laid flat all that stood in it was an uncontrollably burning Cathederal with an intact tower it still stands in fact to this day. And the British in return earmarked and did exactly the same to Dresden to wreak their revenge. As for the blitz being a success no not really it led to the capture of many of his best and most experienced aircrews hence he resorted to using the V1 pilotless bombers that the Brits jokingly called ' The Doodlebug'



More bombs were however dropped on London than Coventry though they undoubtedly damaged the war effort and sometimes morale. They did not do nearly the amount of damage to the war effort as the bombing of Coventry did.

My grandparents lived and worked in Coventry throughout the war and the Coventry Blitz. So i have heard their first hand stories.

A very interesting and well researched book can be read about the bombing of Coventry it is called The Coventry Option... It's by an Author called Alan Burton.

' It explains how the bombing of Coventry was made possible by the Irish Republican Army of the time.

Without their help The German Luftwaffe and their planes would never have been able find the city or bomb their targets.

Coventry was surrounded by wooded countryside... The Home guard had laid a huge painted canvasses on the treetops complete with barrage balloons about 5 miles from the city center to the North and East of Coventry in order to change the City's appearance from the air hence the German pilots and navigators had often mistook it to be a part of the Small Heath area of Birmingham in their earlier raids. due to the shape of the great canvasses.



The Coventry raids were also unique as the Coventry raids were the first ever to be conducted under the guidance of a homing signal.

The transmitter was smuggled into the Rolls Royce aero engine plant In the inner city area of Cheylesmore.

This was the same plant that was responsible for the production of the Spey and Merlin engines. That were built to power the Hurricane and Spitfire fighters of The Royal Air force. And Coventry also produced the engines for most of Britains heavy bombers. Finally as to British morale .... Hitler greatly underestimated them on that. One place the British excel is in the face of adversity.



@ -Charli Most of the bombers used had 4 or 5 man crews. Plus they often needed German fighter support to reach their targets. So German losses were far from few. In fact the Battle of Britain really was the air battle that took the wind out of their Luftwaffe's sails for the remainder of the War.
Andy Lucia
2013-10-20 11:20:07 UTC
The 7 month Blitz on London?

The East End of London absolutely

The Docks were there and they could just follow the river in

What killed more people in the Blitz was not the bomb itself but the Blast or Shockwave/Concussion of the bombs which sucked air out of people's lungs killing them instantly.

Sad but true

*Over a period of 267 days (almost 37 weeks), London was attacked 71 times (from Wiki)
imanomad
2013-10-20 12:22:06 UTC
London was the worst hit but the Germans had a word for the blitz based on Coventry because they thought that they had destroyed Coventry. Having survived the blitz the UK and USA tried to destroy Germany.
anonymous
2013-10-23 07:48:07 UTC
Whilst most people think London was the most damaged it was actually Hull. Whilst London was hit the most Hull was the most damaged - 95 percent of houses were damaged or destroyed.

Liverpool was hit badly as were Coventry and Birmingham. Coventry and Birmingham had a lot of Spitfire and tank factories, and there were many munitions factories in Coventry, so in a way these bombings hit harder ase they affected weapons production.



I think they were a success as they caused a lot of damage and and relatively few germans were killed during the attacks (600 bombers lost),



I think the country responded as well as they could to the damage, but the government responded even better as they used it to produce more propaganda, which in turn brought up morale.
anonymous
2016-03-09 04:40:49 UTC
1. no - injury problems 2. no - almost impossible to keep up last years pace 3. no - Boston clearly better 4. no - they suck lol 5. yes - pretty sure he did last year and dont think he'll get any worse 6. yes - Chicago are too good and they have no other goalies 7. no - too many good rookies out there for him to beat out 8. yes - he's done it before and the team as a whole will be better 9. yes - done nothing to replace Richards 10. no - I think this will be the year he starts declining 11. yes - wouldve picked Hemsky but he'll either be hurt or traded 12. no - they suck 13. no - Sharks were already good and they improved their weak spot (D-men) in the offseason 14. no - Heatley high 60s, Koivu high 60s, Setoguchi 50, thats nowhere near 200 15. no - injury problems
?
2013-10-20 11:04:05 UTC
The largest amount of bombs dropped during the blitz fell on London, the second largest fell on Liverpool. Though most cities experienced air raids, Coventry took one hell of a pounding, destroying a large portion of the city and it's industrial areas.



Why don't you Google "The bitz"
?
2016-10-05 08:56:07 UTC
What Was The Blitz
redunicorn
2013-10-20 11:00:04 UTC
London was the worst hit. The Brits responded wonderfully. Look at the looting that happens in other places after floods or other disasters.



"London was hit for 57 consecutive nights. In one year (1940) 13,000 Londoners were killed as well as 10,000 other Britons."


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...