Question:
Hindus and Sikhs ~ What can you tell me about the Rajputs?
2009-11-23 01:00:50 UTC
Hindus and Sikhs ~ What can you tell me about the Rajputs?
Nine answers:
2009-11-24 04:26:27 UTC
I just said what I wished to say . That had nothing to do with the Rajputs . I just find your Q and presented my view .

Now coming back as a reply , Yes , I agree Sikhs and Hindus are brothers in a way , since both are dharmic religions . We can set an example to the world which Jews and Muslims have failed to ( Jews , Muslims are also brothers ) . I know Hindus come to Gurudwaras also . But , as you said why we are distancing a bit ?

Then you should ask yourself why ? I don't consider a common Hindu as a culprit .

You know better than me that Sikhs never create a shout out of nothing . There is always some reason . And this is also true that Muslim ( Mughals mostly ) have done a lot of harm to Hinduism . And I also know most Sikhs never feel comfortable with Muslims , not because we hate them , but because majority of them hate us !

Sikhs and Hindus intermarry because a Hindu father knows his daughter will also be cremated when she dies in a Sikh family .

But , as you said that you are aware of a bit tension between Sikhs and Hindus also lately , then who is responsible ? A few people who claim themselves to be Hindus .

In fact , in my opinion , A Hindu will never do what these few people do ! The worst part is that they are the ones who claim to be representing Hindus across the world .

Majority of Hindu ( if he really is a hindu ) should have absolutely no friction with Sikhs .

In fact , I myself wonder how come there appears to be arising a conflict between people who are born and brought up in same land , with similar customs ?

Because its all politics ! & BTW the ones who say they are representing Hinduism / Hindus ( the same people who have opened up Parishad's and all ) are surely not representing your community .



edit ~~~~

So , do you hate a common Indian muslim for those invasions and the hindu loss also ?
?
2016-12-04 07:52:53 UTC
Rajput is a forged in India, they have been dwelling than in Rajasthan. Then there have been type of kingdoms battling all the time, subsequently they have been battling prolonged kin like Jats in present Haryana or Punjab in north, Maharatas in extra desirable west. Now in present day time they have unfold throughout. whilst Hindus and Sikhs are religions and rajputs are in bothe faith
2009-11-23 04:59:39 UTC
A Rajput is a member of one of the major Hindu Kshatriya groups of India. They enjoy a reputation as formidable soldiers and it is common to find many of them serving in the Indian Armed Forces. The British Government also accepted them and recruited them heavily into their armies. Current-day Uttar Pradesh is home to most of the Rajputs, although demographically Rajput population and the former Rajput states are found spread through much the subcontinent particularly in north and central India.



Historically, Rajputs rose to prominence during the 9th to 11th centuries, notably the four Agnivanshi clans, namely the Pratiharas (Pariharas), Solankis (Chaulukyas), Paramaras (Parmars), and Chauhans (Chahamanas), rose to prominence first. Rajputs ruled more than four hundred of the estimated six hundred princely states at the time of India's independence. Out of them 121 were Salute states Rajputs ruled 81 of them at the time of independence of India.



ly History (6th to 8th c.)



The Rai Dynasty, who ruled Sindh in the 6th and 7th centuries and were displaced by an Arab army led by Bin Qasim, is sometimes held to have been Rajputs. According to some sources, Bin Qasim, an Arab who invaded Sindh in the 8th century, also attacked Chittorgarh, and was defeated by Bappa Rawal. Certain other invasions by marauding "Yavvanas" are also recorded in this era. By this time, the appellation "Yavvana" (literally: "Ionian/Greek") was used in connection to any tribe that emerged from the west and north-west of present-day Pakistan. These invasions may therefore have been a continuation of the usual invasions into India by warlike but less civilized tribes from the north-west, and not a reference to the Greeks or Indo-Greeks. Lalitaditya of Kashmir defeated one such Yavvana invasion in the 8th century and the Pratiharas rebuffed another in the 9th century.

Rajput kingdoms (8th to 11th c.)
Anjana diyas
2009-11-28 22:33:08 UTC
Hinduism and Sikhism, both religions from India, have had a complex relationship. Sikhism is among the newer world religions, while Hinduism is often considered one of the oldest.

There are examples of Hindu and Sikh shrines being located in close proximity, and Hindus seem to hold the Sikh Golden Temple site in high regard. Hinduism in Punjab is usually held by Sants who claim to incorporate a personal and private path of spiritual development in the common tradition of mystics past and present. They discuss the irrelevance of rituals, priestly class, mandatory contributions, and compulsory gatherings of Hindus and Sikhs, they are regarded as the real Hindu/Sikh who follow teachings from both Sikhism and Hinduism. These movements are more present in Punjab. However in Sikhism, the tenth Guru stated that as a Sikh, one must not follow any other religion.Sikhism is traditionally seen as a religion of warriors who were protectors of those who could not defend themselves.In the days of Mughal oppression, which intensified in the 18th century as the Sikhs openly defied Mughal leadership both local and upward, many non-Sikhs would offer their firstborn sons to join the Khalsa Army to aid in this cause.



A Rajput is a member of one of the major Hindu Kshatriya groups of India. They enjoy a reputation as formidable soldiers and it is common to find many of them serving in the Indian Armed Forces. The British Government also accepted them and recruited them heavily into their armies. Current-day Uttar Pradesh is home to most of the Rajputs, although demographically Rajput population and the former Rajput states are found spread through much the subcontinent particularly in north and central India.

Historically, Rajputs rose to prominence during the 9th to 11th centuries, notably the four Agnivanshi clans, namely the Pratiharas (Pariharas), Solankis (Chaulukyas), Paramaras (Parmars), and Chauhans (Chahamanas), rose to prominence first. Rajputs ruled more than four hundred of the estimated six hundred princely states at the time of India's independence. Out of them 121 were Salute states Rajputs ruled 81 of them at the time of independence of India.

Col. James Tod famously said in his legendary ‘Annals & Antiquities of Rajasthan’- "What nation on earth could have maintained the semblance of civilization, the spirit or the customs of their forefathers, during so many centuries of overwhelming depression, but one of such singular character as the Rajpoot? . . . Rajasthan exhibits the sole example in the history of mankind, of a people withstanding every outrage barbarity could... Read more inflict, or human nature sustain, from a foe whose religion commands annihilation; and bent to the earth, yet rising buoyant from the pressure, and making calamity a whetstone to courage. . . . Not an iota of their religion or customs have they lost.



Culture and Ethos







A talwar sword as it developed under Persian influence in Mughal period India, replacing the khanda characteristic of the medieval period.

The Rajputs were designated by the British as a "Martial Race." They also were the first group in India who originally used the surname Singh. The martial race was a designation created by officials of British India to describe "races" (peoples) that were thought to be naturally warlike and aggressive in battle and to possess qualities like courage, loyalty, self sufficiency, physical strength, resilience, orderliness, a hard working nature, a fighting tenacity, and military strategy. The British recruited heavily from these "martial races" for service in the colonial army.[4]

The Rajput ethos is martial, in spirit, and fiercely proud and independent, and emphasizes lineage and tradition. Rajput patriotism is legendary, an ideal they embodied with a sometimes fanatical zeal, often choosing death before dishonour. Rajput warriors were often known to fight until the last man.

All recorded instances of Jauhar and "Saka" have featured Rajput defenders of a fort, resisting the invasion of a Muslim force. On several occasions when defeat in such an engagement became certain. The Rajput defenders of the fort scripted a final act of heroism that rendered the incident an immortal inspiration and afforded the invaders only an exceedingly hollow, inglorious victory. In such incidents, the ladies of the fort would commit collective self-immolation. Wearing their wedding dresses, and holding their young children by the hand, the ladies would commit their chastity to the flames of a massive, collective pyre, thereby escaping molestation and dishonour at the hands of the invading army. As the memorial of their heroic act, the ladies would leave only the imprint of the palm of their right hands on wet clay, which have become objects of veneration. This immolation would occur during the night, to the accompaniment of Vedic chants. Early the next morning, after taking a bath, the men would wear saffron-colored garments, apply the as
2009-11-23 10:24:04 UTC
never had a rajput girlfriend but Punjabi women are ok - you want details ? ***** Mataram Male Female unity ?
Aradhana
2009-11-25 04:52:18 UTC
the Rajput's are Rajasthani people.Usually belong to warrior or royal backgrounds. They have good name in those areas.They are associated with bravery
2009-11-23 06:11:50 UTC
The Rajputs (from the Sanskrit tatpurusha compound rājaputra, "son of a king") are a martial race and the ruling class of northern India. In the Hindstani language, those belonging to the Kshatriya Varna of Hindus are generally referred to as "Rajputs". The ruling class of most Indian states from 6th century to 19th century were mostly Rajputs. Most Rajputs claim descent from Shri Ram and Shri Krishna.



ORIGIN & MYTHS:



Rajputs are indigenous to India. Historians have wrongly tried to identify rajputs as descendants of Aryan Invaders, Scythians, Huns etc. Genetic research shows, there was never any aryan invasion of India. In addition Indian castes have no genetic influx from "foreigners". Geneticists, Sanghamitra Sahoo and Toomas Kivisild, in a 2006 paper, have concluded:



. . . chromosomal data consistently suggest a largely South Asian origin for Indian caste communities and therefore argue against any major influx, from regions north and west of India (from so called cradle of civilization), of people associated either with the development of agriculture or the spread of the Indo-Aryan language family.

http://www.pnas.org/content/103/4/843.full





Anthropologist, Sir Herbert Risley, writes on Page 60 of his book, People of India:



. . . we have good historical reason for believing that the scythian invaders of India came from a region occupied exclusively by broad headed races and must themselves have belonged to that type. They were by all accounts, nations or, hordes of horsemen with broad faces and high cheek bones, and short and sturdy of stature, . . . . In their original homes in central Asia steppes their manner of life was that of pastoral nomads, and their instincts were of the predatory order. It seems therefore prima facie unlikely that there descendants are to be looked for among tribes who are essentially of the long headed type (Rajputs), settled agriculturists with no tradition of nomadic or marauding past.



LINEAGES;



Rajputs predominantly belong to three lineages: the Suryavanshi (Solar Race), the Chandravanshi (Lunar Race), and the Agni vanshi (Fire Born). Some scholars also include Rishi vanshi, Nag Vanshi and Vayu Vanshi as separate classes.



There are 36 sub-clans of Rajputs originating from these lineages.



RAJPUT GLORY:



Rajput Kingdoms contended with the rising and expansionist empires of Central Asia, be they Arabs, Moghuls, Mongols Afghans, or other Turks. They earned their reputation by fighting these battles with a code of chivalrous conduct rooted in their strong adherence to tradition and (Hindu dharma). The Rajput Kingdoms held out against the Arab Caliphates and other Central Asian Empires for several centuries.



In the early 11th century, Mahmud of Ghazni conquered the Hindu-Shahi kingdom in the Punjab, and his raids into northern India weakened the Gurjar Pratihara kingdom, which was drastically reduced in size and came under the control of the Chandelas. Mahmud sacked temples across northern India, including the temple at Somnath in Gujarat, but his permanent conquests were limited to the Punjab, and Somnath was rebuilt after the raid. The early 11th century also saw the reign of the polymath king Raja Bhoj, the Paramara ruler of Malwa.



The Rajputs united against foreign invaders once under Bappa Rawal, then under Shakti Kumar of Mewar/Maiwar.



The last GREAT HINDU KING Prithiviraj II, ruler of Delhi, crushed Muhammad of Ghor in 1191with the help of his Bargujar allies and relatives at the First Battle of Tarain and Ghori was captured.



Everyone knows abt Rana Udai Singh, Rana Pratap & the Battle of Haldighat.



During the rule of Aurangzeb the rajputs started a 30 year rebellion against him in protest of placing a muslim on the throne of Marwar.
pali@yahoo.com
2009-11-23 02:26:15 UTC
on search engine type:

history of Rajputs

and read all the links. it is not a small history
2009-11-23 02:16:34 UTC
They had many wives, used to commit sati, did not bathe that much (no water in the desert), brave warriors (no other pastime).


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...