The assertions within your question are a little hard to decipher due to your style of writing, that is, no capital letters, no punctuation, run on sentences, I ‘gently’ suggest that you might consider using the full power of the language to make your points. I know that you can do as past questions (of yours) more fully reflect the power of the language.
That said, I’m assuming that you are talking about history text books used in school systems. I too believe that they are weak in the teaching of history, but not because of any government edict or secret plan. Rather, the teaching, and tools provided are simply thin on content, lacking in substance, as well as being representative of political correctness.
Each of the items you mentioned are not hidden, but each have many books, papers, and seminars given on them. There are various (some times competing) perspectives provided for each of these subjects. These various offering provide as much depth as you (anyone) is willing to delve into rather than simply accept the superficial assertions that you have made. With the information available you could spend large periods of your life doing actual research. For example, your light mentioning of President Andrew Jackson and his involvement (such as it was) in the event commonly referred to as the Trail of Tears is a very complex subject involving Constitutional competing between States (primarily Georgia) and the federal government with much input from the Supreme Court of the United States. It involves treaties and competing interests within the Indian community.
Your comments relative to Africa, “ . . . slavery they did africa wrong. they should apologize for wat they did and pay money for the damage for wat they did to africa
and the african pple who suffer in america. . . “ seems to try and make points not representing actual facts.
For example, the government of the United States did nothing to Africa. For this I suggest that you ‘research’ the existence of slavery within Africa and focus on its origins. It existed long before any Europeans (or their descendants) reach Africa. When Europeans did reach Africa (among other things) they were offer the slaves (primarily by Islamic tribesmen who captured them) for sale.
You seem to further suggest that the descendants of slaves are due reparations for the slavery that ended some 153 years ago. I suggest that the deaths of some 660,000 whites bringing about an end to slavery of African descendants is already a pretty large reparation. Even so, the case for reparations might have merit for those who actually lived as a slave. Today none of those people are alive. Of their descendants who, as you put it, “ . . . the african pple who suffer in America . . . “ I suggest that you offer an option to them, a return to Africa with a cash settlement. I believe that you would find that nearly all would opt to remain within the United States without a cash settlement because, even with the challenges associated with ethnic origin, they are far better off and have greater opportunities here than in Africa.
Lastly I suggest that if you are going to do research, you might do some with a little more depth. If you need a list of books to read please feel free to contact me and I’ll offer a list on whatever subject in which you have interest.